1860-O Seated Quarter - Page 2 - Coin Community Forum

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 21 / Views: 2,202	Page: of 2

Jaobler Pillar of the Community United States 6394 Posts	Posted 08/27/2015 10:43 pm This is one of those rare instances when the coin actually looks better in my photos than it does in-hand. The obverse shows definite vertical hairlines from a light cleaning and the design elements have a glossy look that suggests the coin was rubbed with a cloth. There is also a shiny scuff below AMERICA on the reverse; maybe somebody used an eraser in this area. NGC had it right. It's a decent-looking coin but the impairment cannot be ignored. Still a good buy I think for the $98 I spent. Report this Post to the Staff
dsfreeworld Pillar of the Community United States 4337 Posts	Posted 08/27/2015 10:52 pm well the pics certainly made it look better than they graded it. is it in-hand yet? does it deserve the details designation? Report this Post to the Staff
paralyse Bedrock of the Community United States 12057 Posts	Posted 08/27/2015 10:57 pm Awesome! I nailed one. Unfortunate about the details grade, though. Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis Report this Post to the Staff
Jaobler Pillar of the Community United States 6394 Posts	Posted 08/27/2015 11:20 pm Quote: is it in-hand yet? does it deserve the details designation? Yes and yes. After the coin arrived I took the photos shown in my opening post; they came out very flattering to the coin IMO. Close examination under a lamp reveals the hairlines and glossy high points which validate the NGC Details opinion. Report this Post to the Staff
IndianGoldEagle Bedrock of the Community United States 36844 Posts	Posted 08/28/2015 7:12 pm The coin sure looks natural in all these photos. Just goes to show how hard it is to buy coins using photos rather than across the counter or display case and having them in your hand. Report this Post to the Staff
CartwheelCollector Valued Member United States 403 Posts	Posted 08/28/2015 9:16 pm That is why I said AU53. I thought they might have just given it the "denotes issues" AU grade, rather than bagging it altogether. Still not a bad coin. Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 21 / Views: 2,202	Page: of 2

First Page Last 15 Replies

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: US Coins and Currency Forums Forum: US Classic and Colonial Coin Grading

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change.