| Author |
Replies: 26 / Views: 2,390 |
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
This is my newest acquisition.  Edited by CartwheelCollector 09/21/2015 12:39 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
The picture isn't loading for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
403 Posts |
How about now? I think I fixed it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
Quote: How about now? I think I fixed it. Working 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
Nice one. Looks MS-65DMPL or possibly MS-66DMPL.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
At least MS65DPL probably 66. Very nice example of 79-S. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 Super coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
   65DMPL, lovely. Wouldn't be surprised by a 66. Did you take the pics?
Edited by edweather 09/21/2015 4:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
MS66 DMPL. shes a beauty. Stunning cameo
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
403 Posts |
They are the sellers pictures. Nobody has the grade right yet.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
It looks MS-65 to me (PL or DMPL, I am not sure which).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
64-PL Doctored up? Or is it 64DMPL?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
OK, I give up   I will say the photos are edited a bit. PL/DMPL fields photograph darker, but not that dark. Maybe just an MS coin with edited pics, fields look a bit grainy? 
Edited by edweather 09/22/2015 12:32 am
|
| |
Replies: 26 / Views: 2,390 |