First Page
Previous Page
Posted 11/21/2015 11:16 pm
Totally late to the party. I was almost positive in your original thread that it was a 1922 No D Die #2. Maybe I should have been more careful because of the corrosion present, that there might be a remnant of a D present. I'm sorry ANACS didn't see it that way, but unfortunately when the smoke clears, they are probably correct. Their email fiasco doesn't do much for their credibility, and the talking head you were communicating with certainly didn't help the situation.
