| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,643 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
I thought it looked close to 1mm-011. I am unsure though. 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Without a side by side, I think it is 011. Either way - nice find. 
Edited by CoinMasters 11/18/2015 02:38 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Looks a bit like the CONECA 1971-D RPM-004? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
An overlay with 1971-D 1MM-011 looks like a match, can you find any markers?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6478 Posts |
No die markers. Fresher die state.
It looks almost,like coneca 004 coop. Almost. So I am not sure?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Here is the markers for this die from the E-disk: Stage A: EDS (unconfirmed) Stage B: Die gouge dot above the Y of LIBERTY - LMDS Die cracks on column # 1, # 2, #11, and #12 - LDS Stage C: Obverse is LMDS Reverse die changed - EDS Stage D: Die scratches North-South on Obverse - LDS Die scratches East-West on upper Reverse - MDS Die cracks on column # 1, # 2, and #12
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6478 Posts |
I will look when I get home from school
|
|
Valued Member
United States
434 Posts |
The rpm is the extra metal on the left side of the D right? It wouldn't be the light shadow below and to the right of the D. Just wanted to know for clarification on rpms. Thanks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
On an RPM, MS7OE, one looks for a previously punched mintmark (or a remnant there of) underneath or near the primary mintmark. All RPM's are on coins minted prior to 1990, because at that time, they were hand-punched on the dies with a hammer. Sometimes they didn't get it right the first or even second time and "polished" off previous punchings before re-punching, however, they sometimes missed some of it. That's what we look for.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
It would be impossible to polish off a mint mark. They are the same height/some taller as the other devices on the coin. They just leave the arrant punch or discard the die.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
434 Posts |
Oh ok. Thanks for the information. I thought a machine punched the mintmark separately. I didn't know they were hand punched.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
Quote: It would be impossible to polish off a mint mark. They are the same height/some taller as the other devices on the coin. They just leave the arrant punch or discard the die. 1922 ?Quote: I didn't know they were hand punched. They stopped hand punching them by hand in 1990
Edited by cwb 11/19/2015 3:24 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2824 Posts |
  so its a D/D & D & D & D or a D/D/D/D/D? I checked several rolls of bu 1958-D and I am sure I would not of pulled those....  I can see them all now..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Quote: It would be impossible to polish off a mint mark. They are the same height/some taller as the other devices on the coin. They just leave the arrant punch or discard the die. Thanks for correcting me Coop. Of course you're right. Sometimes I wonder what I was thinking.  It would certainly be hard to polish off something incuse on the die (air). Were the old punches diamond tipped maybe? 
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,643 |
|