| Author |
 Replies: 23 / Views: 5,287 |
|
New Member
United Kingdom
7 Posts |
Hi I posted a 1932 s quarter and was removed reason being that it had a wrong mark although I think its real as it was in an old coin book along with a 1844 cent, I did try and research could someone help me on this , thanks . Zal   *** Edited by Staff to remove YELLING. All capital letters is the internet version of yelling. Please don't do it in titles or posts. ****** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. *** |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
932 Posts |
Looks off to me, especially the date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
818 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
7 Posts |
Hi Guys , do you have any good comparisons of genuine ones and what to look for , thanks for the help.
Zal
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It appears to be a genuine 1932 Washington quarter with an added S mintmark. On second look the whole coin does look counterfeit. It needs in-hand evaluation or TPG to be sure. Can you provide a close-up photo of the mintmark? Edited by BH1964
01/12/2016 6:34 pm
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
7 Posts |
Hi yes I could try to take a close up picture and post it, The coin book I got had a lot of these State Quarters in it , I found this in the end page on its own and a 1944 cent Abraham link coin too , anyways let me see if I can photo this and mint mark do u mean the s mark ? Regards Zal |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
I agree that the date and mint mark do not look correct.
I would lean toward this coin being fake
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Here's a genuine S mintmark from a 1932-S quarter.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
 Your coin is a counterfeit, there are many wrong details. The 2 in the date is shaped wrong, the middle peak of the W in IGWT should be lower than the outer uprights, IGWT should have low relief, and the mintmark is shaped wrong. I would also bet that the coin is underweight and not silver. Edited by biokemist6
01/12/2016 6:59 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
381 Posts |
 Unfortunately it looks like a cast counterfeit to me, since it has a porous look. The MM is off too. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
650 Posts |
The S mint mark seems a bit big? I took a close up of my circulated 1932-S.  |
|
New Member
United Kingdom
7 Posts |
Tried to take some more images on this
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
The date, all by itself is so WRONG, you really don't need to look further.
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
7 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Entire coin is fake, hate to say it...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I can see the brass showing through the silver plating. My fake 1792 Half Disme is the same story. |
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 5,287 |
Posted 01/12/2016 6:16 pm
