| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,115 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I think we need better pics - these are too washed out.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
431 Posts |
Thank you for the quick response @coinfrog . I took these in natural light. It is in a slab so its harder to photograph without glare. What do you recommend?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I would leave it in the rattler myself.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
The toning really looks nice but the faded looking photos don't let us see enough to grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
Looks like your coin has some nice toning, but we need better pics to actually grade the coin.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
431 Posts |
  Here are some better photos for grading.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
From what I can tell from the pictures I'm going to say AU-53.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Beautiful coin. I'll say MS-64.
|
|
New Member
United States
42 Posts |
VF 25 do to wear of hair from forehead to ear
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1339 Posts |
Sweet old Morgan...I would like to say MS60, maybe better,but i'll bet they said AU-58..very hard to tell without looking at it
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1153 Posts |
its hard telling with those pictures. I agree with dave and leave it in the holder its in.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
431 Posts |
I almost forgot to reveal the grade. Its is MS 63 in an old PCGS Rattler. Thanks for the replies.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,115 |
|