| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,012 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
Went to auction today bought a bag of 10 Morgans...most were cull but 2 ended up looking pretty good here is one.   I think it a pretty good one what do you think? Thanks |
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree. Not the best pics, but I think the obverse field scuffs would keep it from going higher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2403 Posts |
Took Pics again. Hope these are better.   |
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Nice looking coin. MS-63 seems about right.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
I'd be in the 63 camp too. Nice looking Morgan.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18720 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
Thanks again!!
This would be my 1st MS Morgan I've found on the hunt....and I didn't even get to look at it first!!
Finally have one to compare with new ones I look for.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
MS63 and decent strike for an O mint.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
That's a pretty clean cheek, I'd go MS-64 on this one.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
121 Posts |
Looks 64 but I hope that rim nick between the U and R is minor.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
On the fence for this one. It's a clean Morgan but something about the look makes me think "roll coin". Perhaps degraded luster or some signs of light handling. Hence, I'll say this one is a strong MS-62 but not quite at the level of luster I would want to see in a 63.
|
|
New Member
United States
42 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,012 |
|
Posted 02/06/2016 6:12 pm
