Quote:
Whoever falsely makes, forges, or counterfeits any coin or bar in resemblance or similitude of any coin of a denomination higher than 5 cents
The "in resemblance" part is what gets me wondering. This coin certainly resembles a real coin. In fact, it actually resembles
two real coins. But no, it's just a "fantasy" coin. Fine. What if it looked exactly like a real Liberty
Seated dollar, except that it was dated one year before or one year after such coins were actually minted? Still not an exact duplicate, but some might still say the resemblance was uncanny. What if it looked exactly like a real Liberty
Seated dollar and had a legitimate date, but it had a missing or extra mint mark? Still "just" a fantasy coin?
Let's take it a step further (or in a slightly different direction, at least). What about a coin that has all the proper elements of a real Liberty
Seated dollar, but is just very poorly executed. If the design is so bad that it's obviously a fake to any knowledgeable collector, it obviously doesn't "resemble" the real thing very much and probably would resemble it far less than one that simply had an "impossible" date or mint mark.
Where do you draw the line?
Personally, I think that any attempt to make a coin that looks at all like a real coin, regardless of the differences between it and the real coin, is a counterfeit made with the intent to deceive the ignorant. And even if the person making it claims to "just" be making a "fantasy" coin with no intent to deceive, once the coin leaves his hands there is no way to control how it will be represented down the line.