| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 2,672 |
|
|
New Member
United States
17 Posts |
Is it worth the time to have this graded? Also opinions are welcomed.   *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. *** |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3058 Posts |
 to CCF! FYI you posted this in the wrong forum, you should have posted this under Modern Coin Grading just for future reference. I would not send it off because to get it graded would be more $$$ than the coin is worth sadly. You have a beautiful coin there though!  |
|
Moderator
 United States
189125 Posts |
to the Community! I moved your welcome post to the appropriate forum for the proper attention.  |
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
189125 Posts |
No problem! It happens, we fix it.  By the way, a very nice looking cent.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Wow.!!.. nice, MS-65RD..look at the cartwheels on that beauty. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
The reverse has hits on ONE and scratches at the adjacent area. Maybe 65 red. Could be 64 red.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
784 Posts |
I'm at 64RD on this guy. Just a few too many marks on the reverse for me. Although, I suppose it could be from the 2x2. Very nice coin!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I agree MS-64RD . A little too much chatter on reverse .
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19963 Posts |
65RD, I see a ton of luster. The reverse fields are weak in the normal areas for these (die fill issue). IMO the luster is enough to likely overcome the downgrade to 64 from the minor imperfections.....which are exaggerated by pictures.
Edited by BadThad
03/19/2016 01:05 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I think 64RD - too much chatter on shoulder and in obverse fields for 65, imo.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18684 Posts |
65RD also |
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,672 |
|
Posted 03/18/2016 5:33 pm
