Ouch, it's a mistake all right, but not by the mint. A layer was scraped off, yet I'm surprised that the layer still seems to be there, at least partially. That may be the missing part of the nine below! There's also interesting damage on the NW rim, manifesting in denticle-like features. Thanks for sharing.
I would think the part being questioned is the "edge reeding" effect that is on the obverse of a Lincoln Cent, not the chiseled trench about the date/mint-mark? I am guessing that is what Brewsir thought would be evident. How would that part be explained? Thanks, Robert
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use