| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,682 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1431 Posts |
For one, that is obviously not a P!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
536 Posts |
Yup....definitely a D, and there is some "unpleasantness" on the cheek area. And mysteriously, the sale is ended.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4541 Posts |
It is supposedly a sold listing.. I just wonder if anyone has picked up on it? A 67 d is only 2-300 bucks
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
WOW! 1. How did PCGS screw up that bad! 2. How could seller have missed it? Claims to know what he is doing and has a high rating. 3. If seller knew about mistake Shame on him!! 4. And this one cant be stressed enough. By the coin NOT the holder!. Having said that can the TPG company be held responsible for any loses due to their obvious mistake? BTW  this is my 250th post! Edited by MontCollector
04/16/2016 01:16 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1249 Posts |
Wow how the ........ that has to be the seller ripping someone off that's crazy . Idk
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
424 Posts |
Does anyone smell a rat? I sure do. I checked PCGS Coinfacts using the number on the holder. This is hat I found; the pop for this coin on this grade is 19 (a 19 way tie for finest known?). The pictures PCGS has do not look anywhere near to what this coin looks like.
I think we might be looking at a very careful Photo Shop snow job.
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24150 Posts |
Quote:
The pictures PCGS has do not look anywhere near to what this coin looks like. PCGS does not have an image for this coin. Quote:
I think we might be looking at a very careful Photo Shop snow job. There is no way this is anything other than an honest oversight from DLRC. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote:Having said that can the TPG company be held responsible for any loses due to their obvious mistake? Well they can say that it is clearly on obvious error (because t clearly isn't a 67) and therefor falls under the mechanical error exception. In that case they could get out of any responsibility. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
Yea I don't think it's a scam.. I just think that the people haven't looked at it good.. I personally was just browsing high grade SBA's trying to sharpen my grading skills and saw it.. I have seen a lot of 81-d coins and I was almost thrown off until I said hey I think this is holdered as a P.. Like others said, David Lawrence is reputable |
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,682 |
|
Posted 04/15/2016 11:29 pm
