| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,165 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
99 Posts |
Bot sure what the image optimizer did to my last picture so here it is again.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Neither of them are FB. Not even close.
There is too much glare in the pictures to assign a numerical grade, but they both look MS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1054 Posts |
1945 is one of the most toughest years for full bands. That's why there's such a huge price jump. As stated to the fellow poster before me, these are non-full split banded examples.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
No kidding. I guess I better do more reading. That would be a good reason the FB are worth so much in this year
|
|
Valued Member
United States
422 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
To be designated full bands the middle bands need to be fully split along with the top and bottom ones.....45 used dies from other years that's why there are very few 45 with full bands. These two may have top and bottom bands but the middle are nowhere close to being fully split.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
That makes sense why the 45's are so valuable. I was looking at the horizontal lines not the bands. Here is a picture to help someone else not make the same mistake. One of them has to be ms65-66. Also has soe die clash  |
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
Here is a better picture of the clash  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
They look to be MS-62 and MS-64 and obviously not full bands. Nice uncirculated examples, though.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,165 |
|
Posted 04/20/2016 10:38 pm
