Posted 05/04/2016 07:40 am
Continuing my playing:
Minolta 75mm F4.5 ( a truly horrible lens in my experience but you can buy one for under US$10.00)
Olympus I'm Zuiko 135mm F 4.5
I like it but as can be seen it isn't that good with CA better than the Minolta 75mm though)
Now this next one really shows that little US$75-US$110 80mm AGFA is a good buy. Sony Fe90mm F2.8. It has an ed element a super ed element and costs US$1100.00 and the Agfa( scroll to the bottom of the first post), as CA goes, is competing well with the sony. Both the FE 90mm and the Agfa out resolve the SonyA7rII sensor:
Switching cameras: OMD-EM10II with 60mm F 2.8 macro ignore the resolution this was a quick shot at low magnification.... the CA is what I was testing and this modern lens appear to be doing well:
And the 4/3rds lens Olympus ED 50mm F2 (its only a 1:2 lens but it has good performance as far as CA goes.
Minolta 75mm F4.5 ( a truly horrible lens in my experience but you can buy one for under US$10.00)
Olympus I'm Zuiko 135mm F 4.5
I like it but as can be seen it isn't that good with CA better than the Minolta 75mm though)
Now this next one really shows that little US$75-US$110 80mm AGFA is a good buy. Sony Fe90mm F2.8. It has an ed element a super ed element and costs US$1100.00 and the Agfa( scroll to the bottom of the first post), as CA goes, is competing well with the sony. Both the FE 90mm and the Agfa out resolve the SonyA7rII sensor:
Switching cameras: OMD-EM10II with 60mm F 2.8 macro ignore the resolution this was a quick shot at low magnification.... the CA is what I was testing and this modern lens appear to be doing well:
And the 4/3rds lens Olympus ED 50mm F2 (its only a 1:2 lens but it has good performance as far as CA goes.
Edited by austrokiwi
05/04/2016 2:09 pm
05/04/2016 2:09 pm
