Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Pentax K3-Ii First Results

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,535Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4038 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2016  1:24 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add rmpsrpms to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I became interested in Pentax's Pixel Shift Resolution mode based on srs77's favorable results with the K1. I was less interested in FF, so started looking at the K3-II, which has the same Pixel Shift mode. The K3-II has smaller pixel pitch (3.9um vs 4.9um of the K1) but otherwise are similar, except of course the K3-II is 24MP APS-C while K1 is 36MP FF.

srs77's images were taken around 0.5:1 at f8, so are slightly diffraction-compromised. I wanted to test the K3-II such that the camera was the limiting factor, not the lens, so my first images were taken at M=0.7 and f3.3.

My subject was the 1949-S Lincoln Cent that I'm using for my 80mm shootout. Critical focus was on Lincoln's throat near the center of the image. I did 3 shots: #1 with my Canon T2i as a reference; #2 with the K3-II in non-PS mode; and #3 with the K3-II in PS mode. See the cropped images below:

T2i (reference)

Pentax-K3-Ii-First-Results

K3-II no Pixel Shift

Pentax-K3-Ii-First-Results

K3-II with Pixel Shift

Pentax-K3-Ii-First-Results

To me, the non-PS image looks over-sharpened , and the PS image looks even more over-sharpened and very noisy. Shadow contrast has been reduced, and the noise level is so high that it is actually losing resolution.

I also tested the K3-II at 10x magnification on the same coin, zoomed-in to the date and mintmark area. I took 100% crops at the bottom left corner of the "4" of the the date. Here are the T2i and both K3-II crops:

T2i (reference)

Pentax-K3-Ii-First-Results

K3-II no Pixel Shift

Pentax-K3-Ii-First-Results

K3-II with Pixel Shift

Pentax-K3-Ii-First-Results

The setup is stable and shows no vibration in Live View, so any movement is caused by the camera. The T2i has EFSC in Live View, but the K3-II does not and shows significant shutter shake blurring in the no Pixel Shift mode. The K3-II does have EFSC in Pixel Shift mode, so the shutter shake is gone, but it appears the Pixel Shift operation creates significant artifacts. Maybe the sensor movement causes a little vibration, as I can see both horizontal and vertical artifacts in the image.

So, do I have a bad K3-II? Or is this technology just not suitable for photomacrography? Are there improvements that went into the K1 that were not present in the K3-II?
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at:
http://macrocoins.com
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2016  1:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I understand, perhaps incorrectly, that pentax's pixel shift is aimed at color resolution. It's purpose is to compensate for faults that are inherent in the Bayer sensor design we all use. You should get much better color resolution but not image resolution.

The Olympus system is the one we would prefer where the sensor shift creates photographs as if they were from a much larger ( better resolving) sensor. So A 16mp Olympus camera can produce 40 mp pictures of the type we coin collectors would want.

You may need to check that I am correct about my understanding of the pentax sensor shift . I will go and look again for the reviews that gave me this understanding.

Edit found the DPreview of the K1 it says this:


Quote:
Then there's the Pixel Shift Resolution mode that increases color resolution by shooting four consecutive images with the sensor moved by one pixel - effectively canceling the Bayer color filter array and lowering noise by image averaging.


The image averaging is probably what you are seeing and not liking( I guess)

2nd edit. To expand.. what the Pentax is doing is creating a dynamic range that a medium format or large format camera is capable of. I find the Sony's A7rII dynamic range is great for every day photography but with coins because I control the lighting..it isn't so important
Edited by austrokiwi
05/22/2016 2:13 pm
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4038 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2016  2:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rmpsrpms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The Pentax system samples all colors at each location. This is supposed to have the effect of improving the sharpness of the image since the color information is not being interpolated. Note that a Bayer sensor does not really have full stated resolution because all the required information is not contained in each pixel. The Pentax system was designed to give full resolution without the need to interpolate. This is a great concept, and indeed much more appealing than what Olympus does (and with better results based on internet images), but it definitely has its limitations if my K3-II results are to be believed.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at:
http://macrocoins.com
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2016  2:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It would be interesting to see a comparison between the Olympus and Pentax systems. I had thought that the Olympus system would produce better resolution in terms of cycles per mm and so was better suited to macro. I had thought the Pentax system was a mechanical version of Sigmas Foveon sensor.

There is one issue with comparing Olympus and pentax sensor shift tech... that's the sensor size the MFT sensor produces more noise than a larger sensor so might hide the potential difference between the two.

I wonder if part of the problem is the actual sensor shifting is creating more vibration( with Macro work)
Edited by austrokiwi
05/22/2016 2:55 pm
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4038 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2016  3:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rmpsrpms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think both are true...the Olympus system should produce better resolution, but from the example photos I've seen the result falls short. The Pentax is indeed a mechanical version of Foveon. The images I've seen from Foveon are superb and that gave me hopes of similar performance from the Pentax.

It does look like the sensor shift movements are creating some camera vibration. In the last pic you can see vertical and horizontal artifacts that I think could only be caused by such movement.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at:
http://macrocoins.com
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,535Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums