Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1976 No Mint Mark Bicentennial Quarter ... Error? Opinions Please

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 16,213Next Topic  
Valued Member
Aftermathew's Avatar
United States
112 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2016  8:17 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Aftermathew to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I have a bicentennial quarter that ways 5.8 grams (my scale only does incriminates to the nearest 0.10th of a gram) all my other bicentennial quarters weigh in at 5.6. it's not a silver clad and is not an S mint, there's no mint mark so it would have been minted in Philadelphia. The rim appears thicker than the others but, why? It looks thicker, weighs approximately 0.1/0.2 grams more and is not silver. Is it an error? What is it?
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 07/05/2016  04:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think the weight is within mint tolerance. +/- .19g
John1
Edited by John1
07/05/2016 04:25 am
Valued Member
NoPoMoCo's Avatar
United States
403 Posts
 Posted 07/05/2016  07:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add NoPoMoCo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry, not an error. Just a coin with slight differences in weight and appearance from typical specimens, and within the acceptable variations expected. Could have been that slightly oversized (but within tolerance) blanks through the upsetting mill resulted in wider rims on planchets used for striking.
Valued Member
Aftermathew's Avatar
United States
112 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2016  9:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Aftermathew to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Awesome, thanks guys. I hadn't seen that before and I hadn't heard about the acceptable parameters for coins coming out of the mint
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 16,213Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to rattle this change. Forums