| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,628 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
125 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2490 Posts |
99% Acetone, easily available online, would probably bring your coins up to a state known as Blast White. Some US collectors like that. Otherwise, you could leave them just as they are. There's little value in them, but they are nice to hold.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
Thanks for the tip. I was wondering about using acetone, but I didn't know whether it would help with these coins because it almost seems like the silver finish has been worn off in places.
Edited by Monnaie 08/26/2016 11:36 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1326 Posts |
The first coin looks pretty nice as is.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1351 Posts |
Selective work with a cotton bud and Goddards silver dip could improve the look of the 2nd coin.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
I'll give acetone a try, and then will store them properly, in coin sleeves, rather than toss them back into the box of coins from which they came.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
206 Posts |
Like otto, I would definitely not touch the first one. Looks nice and toned.
If you did proceed with the acetone bath on any of them. pictures would definitely be appreciated. Also if you did, for how long did you let them soak?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
I changed my mind; I don't want to risk ruining it.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
I got brave (it just took a few months  ) and soaked these coins in pure acetone. I changed the acetone "bath" about 5 times (soaking for just a few minutes each time) and rubbed very gently with a cotton swab. Then I rinsed them in distilled water. A lot of black gunk came off, particularly from the first coin, but they actually don't look all that different: most of the improvement is in the quality of the photography. Here are some before and after photos. Coin A "before"  Coin A "after" (also much better lighting)  Coin B "before"  Coin B "after" 
Edited by Monnaie 11/28/2016 11:39 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
458 Posts |
good luck I would leave them alone
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
18017 Posts |
This is quite a common problem on the British George V 50% silver coins - the copper seems to come to the surface. I've sometimes cleaned detector finds and they've stayed white for a while but the copper color has usually come back. The George VI coins from 1937-46 don't seem to be as badly affected.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
Thanks, Rob and BigChip.
Are the photos clear enough to determine whether the coins are KM# 828 or 815a.2?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
18017 Posts |
It's KM #828 - the Modified Effigy variety. The designer's initials BM are further to the right on the Modified Effigy coins and don't have stops after them. On the earlier portrait, the initials are larger, have stops after them and are roughly in the centre of the truncation.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
Thanks again, Rob. You have sharp eyes; those initials aren't easy to see!
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,628 |
|