| Author |
 Replies: 23 / Views: 2,735 |
|
Valued Member
United States
113 Posts |
All input appreciated. Grading & Approximate Value?   |
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
113 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
73 Posts |
Nice find. Looks about an AU57
|
|
Valued Member
United States
73 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
534 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
73 Posts |
Yep..Was looking at the condition. Not a WAM |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1602 Posts |
Definitely close and AU50. Not a broadstrike so no premium. Reverse looks like it was struck-through something (grease?).
Edited by Biedercoins
08/28/2016 06:20 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
No WAM, its a CAM, just a misaligned die, no premium, and Struck Through Grease, no premium. There is no such grade as AU57, I would say AU-50 |
|
Moderator
 United States
15489 Posts |
This is not a WAM reverse ... common date coin worth $0.01 David Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
Also there is no WAM variety for denver minted coins |
|
Valued Member
United States
113 Posts |
Actually, it looks like it is brand new.
My pictures don't come out right.
I use my phone. Trying to learn.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
CAM which is normal. Very nice shape but still only worth $0.01.
Good luck on the hunt!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Quote:
Nice find. Looks about an AU57
First off, no such thing as an AU57 grade. Please don't give false valuations either - $10-15? Where'd you come up with that? |
|
Valued Member
United States
73 Posts |
Overlooked WAM which only valued at moderate price. AU-57 how I would grade, not others, just me,to value a better then AU50. |
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 2,735 |
Posted 08/28/2016 12:29 am
