Hi Coin Hunter.
I am going to disagree with you on the "most things depreciate 38%" line. If you buy an item that has a finite lifetime ie. a consumable product like a car, a blender, a winter coat even a house if separated from the land beneath it, there is a defined and accepted depreciation cycle. Most businesses can write off the value of a computer in 2-3 years... Cars 5-7 etc.
Items purchased without a finite lifetime such as ornamental figurines (Doulton et al.), NCLT coins, fine art work etc. all should retain some association with their initial value. NCLT is market valuation driven and if the product routinely drops in value by a significant amount, then the initial pricing is too high.
I am personally in this because I enjoy collecting coins... we all have our own reasons... it is not for investment purposes however, if the valuations in the secondary market for an ornamental product are significantly and routinely lower, the market is telling the producer that the price they are charging is too high... Ultimately, this will result in a collapse of the primary market and a pullback on the part of the producer.
Whether the gap is mintage, aesthetic or initial cost is irrelevant. If the market does not ultimately sustain the prices for non consumable products, the market will go away. The occasional ladybird or superman coin will not save the
RCM from a perceived lack of value.
My concern is that given the write downs experienced by the mint in the aftermath of the FV reversal, there is little resilience to weather a declining market storm. There are too many products, questionable aesthetics, over-inflated valuations for the
RCM to sustain their current operational model.
We are already seeing pullbacks (Vancouver store closing). What next?