| Author |
Replies: 45 / Views: 6,739 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
january1may, thanks for the explanation, we'll list them separately then (and add a note that the Grossus is called Gröscher in the literature on the subject). paralyse, I'd like to keep the Notgeld out of this since there is no clear line between coins actually made for circulation and speculative issues among them. Joseph7420, now that's a lot of new information, thanks a lot, I much appreciate your effort!  Stuber added, new early date for Pfennig noted, Petermenger added (along with alternative spelling Petermentger and some extended dates), Goldgulden added (also found a 1/2 Goldgulden of the same type dated 1750), Denier added (this particular coin is already on the Odd Denominations list but it is also useful for this one), Denar added (I wasn't actually aware that a coin that said "denar" existed!) Others: some unverified dates for Grossus and Dreiling added. I'll post the list with all the additions made so far.
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
303 Posts |
Quote: ...and add a note that the Grossus is called Gröscher in the literature on the subject.
Not exactly. I just browsed through the Neumann catalogue vol. 2 for coins from Brandenburg and Prussia. Some coins (those who actually have Grossus spelled right on them) are called Groschen. The Groschen (Grossus) dates back to the late 15th century. A Groschen of Johann Cicero, minted around 1490, already has GROSSVS in the legend. As mentioned earlier, the varieties of the word stem were somewhat different in the Prussian provinces, especially as long as there were provincial issues of Prussian coins. From about 1690 to 1790 I'd say Gröscher was the denomination in Eastern and Western Prussia, whereas in Silesia Gröschel were minted and Brandenburg, Posen and other provinces had the Groschen. Those differences ceased to exist when minor coinage was standardized for whole Prussia around 1820. I am not too certain about whether they all had the same value but I suppose not, regarding the late 18th century copper Groschen from Eastern/Western Prussia, and the tiny billon Gröschel from Silesia for instance. But it is very interesting how a discussion like this one here can encourage to think about certain matters, that one would never have thought of. :) Best wishes from Berlin
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
Quote: Denar added (I wasn't actually aware that a coin that said "denar" existed!) Yeah, I was quite surprised when I found it! So I went through Numista to find some additional dates, and found.. well, some additional dates. Hopefully I have all of the right links in the right places, because I really do not feel like double checking them all. Albus: 1636 to 1793. Dreiling: 1783 to 1855. Ducat: only an older one, but 1635. The only other dates I could find were 1640 and 1824. Mariengroschen: 1621 to 1834. Gulden: only an older date of 1753. Kreuzer / Kreutzer: If the K is an abbreviation of Kreuzer, then 1622. If not, that would push it forwards to 1623. And there is also a newer one dated 1873. Krone: not only found in Prussia, but also Saxony, Hannover, and Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel. One from Saxony is dated 1857 to 1871. Sechsling: 1726 to 1855. Thaler: I think the Thal stands for Thaler, and there is one like that dated 1691. The newest one I could find was 1866. Now, would a Gute Groschen the same as a Guter Groschen? If so, they can be dated from 1671 to 1834. I could not find anything different for Groten, but is a Grote the same thing? Just an alternate spelling? No date changes, but some Neugroschens were also made in Saxe-Altenburg ( example). I could not find any older dates for the Schwaren nor the Heller, and also no newer dates for the Heller. And finally: here is a Nautsch Heller, and there is also the Reichsthaler, dated from 1672 to 1818. And I should add that I did not check for dates on anything added since the last update post.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
Potsdam, that Grossus thing is getting out of hand  Actually, I found that the Spitzgroschen mentioned by Spence also says Grossus, so that one goes back at least to 1475 (with actual dates). Now what do we do with the Gröscher if it is never written on coins? Joseph7420, good job again, that's a small step in the right direction! As I pointed out, the dates we have right now are nowhere near what they should be so most should be pushed back/forward by many years. All your new dates and states have been added. You also found a new spelling you didn't mention - Ducatus  I have always assumed that Groten->Grote and Guter Groschen->Gute Groschen are the singular/plural forms, like Cent->Cents, and that's how I've been adding them. I can only hope that's correct now... I must say I do not know what the "Nautsch" in Nautsch Heller means. Is it a place-name adjective (and would therefore be omitted from the list) or is it something else? - - - Things I found: 1799 Mattier from Lippe-Detmold (new late date, from Krause), 1637 Frankfurt Albus (new early date, listing), 1620 six-kreuzer piece from Nurnberg (new early date, listing), Leichter Kreuzer also issued by Bamberg and dates for this one, new late date and new states for Stuber, dates for Speciestaler, new early and late dates for Goldgulden, found coins that actually say Ducat (with that particular spelling - issued by Brunswick-Calenberg-Hannover), and finally found something that says Conventionthaler (or at least part of it): 24 EIN CONVEN. THALER dated 1772 from Constance (pictured in Krause). New entries: Convention Kreuzer from Frankfurt - NGC entry. Mariengulden from Brunswick-Wolfenbuettel (1623-1624) - NGC entry. Pistole (5 thaler in gold) from Brunswick-Calenberg-Hannover (1803) - NGC entry.
Edited by DL20K 02/07/2017 05:50 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
When Albrecht declared the Knights of the Teutonic Order for Lutheranism and formed the Duchy of Prussia, as a vassal state/fiefdom of Sigismund I of Poland, the monetary union entered into between the two led to two systems: the East and Brandenburg had the Pfennig, Schilling (=6 pfe.), Groschen (=3 Schilling), 3 Gröscher, 6 Gröscher and T(h)aler/Tolar/Joachimsthal guldiner (=24 Gröscher), the result being 24 Groschen to the Thaler; the West had 18 Pfennige to the Groschen, resulting in a 30-Groschen Thaler which matched well to the 30-groszy zloty of Poland.
3 Gröscher coins from Albrecht's Duchy of Prussia have the denomination listed as "GROSS." (sic) whereas the Groschen coins have no denomination at all.
The Reichsmünzordnung and subsequent Diets by 1566 (Leipzig) had set the standard for the Taler/Thaler at 1/9th Cologne Mark, approx. 29.23g .890 fine silver; a Cologne mark being 1/2 Pfund fine silver. The resulting Reichsthaler went with the East Prussian: 1 Groschen/Gutegroschen = 12 Pfennige (1/24 Thaler); a bit later, 1 Mariengroschen = 8 Pfennige (1/36 Thaler).
The southern States said to heck with all of that complicated nonsense, and kept a relatively simple 60 Kreuzer = 1 gulden, although they couldn't avoid the currency insanity for much longer (Kreutzer Landmünze..)
The Convention Thaler gets its name because in 1754 a new standard of 1/10th Cologne Mark (23.39g .890 fine silver) was adopted throughout most of the German States by way of a monetary convention; naturally, Prussia had to do its own thing and set its own devalued standard of 1/14th Cologne Mark (originally 16.7g, later slightly devalued again to 16.66g, i.e. 1/30th of a "metric pound" or kilogram.)
Gresham's law and ever-increasing Prussian dominance of German affairs combined to make the 1/14 Prussian Vereinsthaler the main standard for large parts of Germany until the Goldmark and unification.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
Edited by paralyse 02/07/2017 11:41 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
Quote: I have always assumed that Groten->Grote and Guter Groschen->Gute Groschen are the singular/plural forms, like Cent->Cents, and that's how I've been adding them. I can only hope that's correct now... Oh, that makes sense. Looking at some Guter Groschens and Gute Groschens, that seems to be the case there. However, there is an inconsistency with the Groten: Oldenburg had at least three 1 grote coins. They also had multiple half grote coins, so I do not think they just decided to abbreviate groten to grote for their singular forms.  And on the topic of Grote coins: Jever had a groot! Also on the topic of Grote coins: Knyphausen can be added to the Grote-using list.
Edited by Joseph7420 02/07/2017 9:27 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
Joseph7420, thank you yet again for your additions! The German Wikipedia says "Groten" so that must be the modern way to write it. The lack of space to write the full word doesn't seem to be the case on the coins you have shown so it may not be just an abbreviation, I'm guessing for some reason at that time and place this was the correct/dominant way to spell it. Therefore, I added both Grote and Groot as alternative spellings. Knyphausen added to Groten-states. Other things I found: Guter Pfennig new late date ( 1826), Albus new early date ( 1609), Mecklenburg-Schwerin had a Dreiling, Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach had Gute Pfennige, Saxe-Meiningen also had Convention Kreuzer coins ( 1765).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
Added: Guter Pfennig - new late date: 1832 (Schaumburg-Hessen) Krause says it is the last year - at least for this state. Schaumburg-Lippe ended their run of these in 1826.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I am not sure if these two have been mentioned already, but I found a Solidus from Brandenburg, and that Hamburg and Mecklenburg-Schwerin used the Schillinge Courant from 1763 to 1809.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
Add: Krause lists a Mecklenburg-Schwerin Schilling dated 1670.
Joseph7420, well now, that means more questions for the Germans... - Is Solid/Solidus another spelling for Schilling? One can easily find a coin that says Solidus described as Schilling and vice versa among German listings. - What is the meaning or significance of putting Courant after the Schilling? Does it make it a different Schilling?
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
303 Posts |
What I can say for Prussian Solidus coins is that in German literature they are referred to as Schilling.
The Courant (just different spelling for the contemporary word Kurant) basically means that the value of the coin is covered by the amount of material that it consists of (opposed to Scheidemünzen, whose material was less worth than the denomination).
Thus, you could be sure that having a 1 Schilling Courant coin, that its silver content measured up with the value of 1 Schilling.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Poland
3201 Posts |
And so the Germans have spoken. Thanks a lot for the clarification, Potsdam! I wasn't aware of the significance of the "Scheidemünze" inscription either!  Considering that, I've added Solidus as an alternative spelling for Schilling. We won't be adding the Schilling Courant separately then - it's the same Schilling just in good silver as opposed to Scheidemünzen. What remains is, if we have an inscription that says SOLID (without the -us), is that an abbreviation? Example here. The other words are written in full, so would this be another spelling?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Slightly related: Roman libra / solidus / denarius = Pfund Feinsilber / S(c)hilling / Groschen (=grossus denarius, orig. = 6 denarii)
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I think I have found a few more new ones: Landau made some Florin coins with a dual denomination with the Kreuzer. I am pretty sure the FL stands for florin. Landau also made (at least) two Livre coins with a dual denomination with the Sol. One can be found here. Mainz also made a Sol. And there is the Liard from Württemberg-Montbeliard. EDIT: Is the second one a dual denomination? Both values are the same, so could it be just one? 
Edited by Joseph7420 02/11/2017 5:28 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
263 Posts |
Edited by Spott 02/11/2017 11:21 pm
|
| |
Replies: 45 / Views: 6,739 |