| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,623 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
234 Posts |
CDN identifies values for mint sets based upon sets in original mint packaging (I think). Do you discount the value of mint sets not in original mint packaging specific to those values shown in CDN?
This question being posed with the understanding that the coins appear to be original mint packaging condition.
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
The values in the Greysheet assume OGP (original government packaging) for GSA dollars, Blue/Brown Ikes, Mint sets, and Proof sets. Examples that have been reholdered (e.g. Capital Plastics mint set holders) or broken out and slabbed (e.g. a NGC-graded GSA Morgan dollar NOT in its original GSA holder) should correctly be priced by their individual coin values. As an example, a 1961 Mint Set has a Greysheet bid of $34.50. This assumes original government packaging (flat pack envelope) of average Mint Set coins (no ugly/gorgeous toning, no die varieties, etc.) If the set consists instead of individual 1961-dated Uncirculated coins in a Capital holder, that would be valued on a per-coin basis, not with the Mint set pricing. You can still use the Greysheet pricing for mint sets if you'd like, but it relies on you to know the difference between a genuine US Mint Set and a Brand X plastic Mint Set holder filled with slider AU's and cleaned coins. The earlier you go back, the less likely you are to realize an offer at a given Bid/Ask without it being an OGP set -- you might get away with it for 1961, but I doubt it would work for any 1949 and older sets, wherein OGP becomes more than just some plastic and paper and instead becomes a distinct value-added component of the total price.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
Edited by paralyse 03/23/2017 10:15 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
234 Posts |
Thanks paralyse,
I took a look again at the grey sheet and noticed the 'small print' noting OGP being applicable for 1955-date. It doesn't specifically address, but seems to infer that date sets prior to 1955 aren't priced as OGP.
The reason I brought up the subject was that my LCD had five sets (1950 -1954)for sale that were housed in a cardboard set holder which had toned the coins a cobalt blue and gold color. He was pricing the proof sets based upon a discounted CDN value so wanted to try to confirm the grey sheet numbers.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
It's buyer and dealer preference. I won't usually pay Grey bid/ask for non-OGP Proof or Mint sets; but attractively toned 1950s and earlier proof sets in non-OGP holders will almost always bring a premium vs. bid/ask. If a 1949 Proof Set came on the market with that kind of toning in non-OGP I'd shell out the megabucks, regardless of CDN. However, a random assemblage of 1949 Proof issues in a Brand X holder is, to me, a set of Proofs, not a Proof Set. One thing to remember is that sets from this era were shipped in cardboard holders for the P, D, and S mints (for Mint Sets) and as loose coins, cellophane-wrapped, in cardboard boxes (Proof sets) before the cello flat packs became standard for both up until 1965 (SMS and the introduction of hard plastic holders which would be used for all SMS and later Proof sets.) I perceive part of the value of a "Proof set" or "Mint set" as being a complete set of coins as packaged and delivered by the Mint. In other words, the value to me is in a "Proof Set", not merely a date set of Proof coins. CDN's approach seems to be that since OGP Proof Sets from 1954-earlier are quite scarce, that the price should reflect a market average for the individual component coins, and thus leave it up to the seller to ask a premium (for OGP/toning) or offer a discount (ugly spotting, milk, haze) as needed. This seems fair to me. Bottom line is, if you see an attractively toned Proof set, regardless of OGP or not, or what kind of holder it's in, Greysheet is pretty much going to go out the window as far as price levels. If you think the dealer is asking an excessive price, check ebay sold listings for OGP 1954 and earlier Proof sets and then see if the toning is worth the premium over the average sale price of an 'average' OGP Proof Set. For instance, if a 1954 Proof Set in OGP sells for an average of (made up numbers) $320, Greysheet is $450, and the dealer is asking $420, if you think the attractive toning is worth the $100 premium over an average OGP set, then pull the trigger!
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: The reason I brought up the subject was that my LCD had five sets (1950 -1954)for sale that were housed in a cardboard set holder which had toned the coins a cobalt blue and gold color. He was pricing the proof sets based upon a discounted CDN value so wanted to try to confirm the grey sheet numbers. Was he selling proof sets or mint sets? This thread seems to be mixing the two. Quote: If a 1949 Proof Set came on the market with that kind of toning in non-OGP I'd shell out the megabucks, regardless of CDN. However, a random assemblage of 1949 Proof issues in a Brand X holder is, to me, a set of Proofs, not a Proof Set. I would pay more than melt for it,they didn't make proofs in 1949.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
705 Posts |
For the average collector, is the subscription cost of Greysheet and/or Bluesheet worth the cost?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
I picked 1949 as a random date because 1) I'm at work and 2) it was the first year that popped into my mind (my mom's birth year.) I could have used 1951, or 1941, but didn't, so sorry if that caused confusion somehow.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Greysheet is handy but Bluesheet is almost entirely irrelevant unless you are doing sight-unseen bidding.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I find getting a back issue of the weekly and monthly greysheet semi annually and the quarterlies annually to be sufficient for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
705 Posts |
How does Greysheet compare to Numismedia? Which is a better or more accurate price guide? I hope I am asking the questions the right way.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: For the average collector, is the subscription cost of Greysheet and/or Bluesheet worth the cost? Probably not. Prices don't change that fast/often. You would probably do just as well buying the occasional issue and downloading it online.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4591 Posts |
Quote: How does Greysheet compare to Numismedia? Which is a better or more accurate price guide? I hope I am asking the questions the right way. The meaning of the greysheet has changed in the last year+ under new ownership. The Bluesheet is dealer sight-unseen prices, i.e. what a dealer is posting on the exchanges that he will pay another dealer for the coin without seeing it. A generic price if you prefer. Greysheet is the highest posted prices for dealer-to-dealer sight-seen coins, i.e. what a dealer will pay another dealer for the coin after seeing it. Numismedia is retail prices, what you would pay at a coin shop. Sales at venues like coin shows are typically a little over greysheet.
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
234 Posts |
Well, I needed a stiff drink after returning to purchase the sets and my LCD had sold them. He had told me he would hold them a couple days, but apparently he chose not to.
All I can say is ... whoever bought them, got five stunning sets. And for whoever asked, they were incredibly toned proof sets housed in black cardboard holders. From what was referenced in one of the responses, they may have been original mint holders.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
If they were in black cardboard holders they were NOT in the original government packaging. Neither the proof or mint sets of that era came in black holders. Proof sets of that era came withthe coins in individual cellophane bags stapled together in a gray cardboard box (In 1954 or 55 they started using polyethylene bags and in mid 1955 they switched to the "cellophane flat packs.) The mint sets did come in cardboard holders but they were a gray cardboard not black.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,623 |
|