| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,410 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
280 Posts |
Edited by Scarp9603 06/14/2017 5:31 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1609 Posts |
Reverse pic seems pretty blurry to me. Based on obverse, I give it an AU55, possible weak strike.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 Bigger pics would help.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
280 Posts |
Better images  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
I'll stick with AU-50 even with the better photos.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
 pitch me a tent in the AU-50 camp. Nice coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
84 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-53, perhaps 55 at best. Leading shoulder wing tip is noticeably worn.
Edited by Coinfrog 06/27/2017 7:58 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
Au 53-55 It looks too nicked up to be MS, despite not being able to see luster through the pic.
EDIT- sorry realized when this was posted didnt mean to start thread necromancy.
Edited by Jon Brand 09/14/2017 11:16 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Judging primarily from the leading wing top, I'd say AU-53 at best, though the obverse looks better.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,410 |
|