I suspect I was thinking of this Zeno example when I said it might actually be 892. There are some differences on the first side, but I don't know if they're important either.
In hand, the digit at 5h on the second photo is clearly a 8 (an unfortunate spot of glare obscures this on the picture). The circle after that is about right for the top of a 9, but the crucial last digit is sadly off flan.
I wasn't sure whether it would be possible to determine the date (still not sure - Zeno entries keep pointing to an article by Ragimov, which I wasn't able to find online yet); and I didn't want to post it as bump material in case it was, perhaps, identifiable as 1487.
I did find a book by Zlobin that describes my type as 043.0 and dates it as 892-4 AH (with the best match in the given pictures being number 141, a coin of 892 AH).
In hand, the digit at 5h on the second photo is clearly a 8 (an unfortunate spot of glare obscures this on the picture). The circle after that is about right for the top of a 9, but the crucial last digit is sadly off flan.
I wasn't sure whether it would be possible to determine the date (still not sure - Zeno entries keep pointing to an article by Ragimov, which I wasn't able to find online yet); and I didn't want to post it as bump material in case it was, perhaps, identifiable as 1487.
I did find a book by Zlobin that describes my type as 043.0 and dates it as 892-4 AH (with the best match in the given pictures being number 141, a coin of 892 AH).






















