| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 6,196 |
|
New Member
Saudi Arabia
28 Posts |
Please send your comment.   *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. *** |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Looks like you scanned your coin. Trying using a darker material/dark paper for the background on top of the coin when you get ready to scan the coin. Also set the scanner to the highest setting to get a quality scan. Too much white causes glare.
|
|
New Member
 Saudi Arabia
28 Posts |
Thank you so much for your comment and suggestion, I got an additional knowledge in scanning coins to get a better picture of the coin in my next posts. Yessss  Edited by Sly923
11/20/2017 3:32 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Edited by Crazyb0
11/20/2017 3:53 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
My 2 Halala's (see what I did there?  ) is that the images aren't good enough to make a determination between Machine Doubling and actual Hub Doubling. I see a few promising areas that could depict Hub Doubling.  If you can't post better close up images of the area in question, can you tell us if the doubling appears to be rounded and raised or flat and shelf like as seen in Coop's marvelous illustrations above?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
Maybe this will help.......  It's not the same year but is the same denomination. Looks to me like the devices appear wider than the norm.... Wait....... I found the same year.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
From what I can see, it looks like Machine Doubling. The devices are not enlarged and there is a reflection coming from the coin that makes me think it is flat and shelf like Machine Doubling.  The two images posted together, one was mirrored in design on the side by side. Even though I know nothing about this language, I figured out what had happened. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4404 Posts |
I think Sly923 is talking about the other side of the coin guys. I think I see notching and separation on the lower half of that side. Am I wrong?
Edited by Tanman2001
11/20/2017 9:25 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The MD is probably on both sides of the coin. A Micro image would show us more. But form looking at the overall size of the devices and the reflection from the MD flat shelf like look on the devices, I concluded it was MD.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
I did notice that, but that seems to be more of a very poor attempt at reingraving of the date (1435 ie: 2014) than a doubled die being that no other devices on the reverse appear to be affected.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
Bottom line......we need better pics!  |
|
New Member
Saudi Arabia
28 Posts |
Thank you so much for your comment and for information, it gave me more and more knowledge in coin errors.
|
|
New Member
Saudi Arabia
28 Posts |
Thank you, everyone, I will send you tomorrow a clearer pic. I didn't even know it was an MD, I still need to do a lot of reading and research. Hehehehehe
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Hang out here with the other coin addicts. You will learn something new all the time here.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote:
being that no other devices on the reverse appear to be affected. The Arabic numeral 5 (0) looks like it is affected as well. It really needs better images or in hand inspection. |
|
New Member
Saudi Arabia
28 Posts |
As promised, here is a clearer and lighter picture of the coin. Thanks Guys!    |
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 6,196 |
Posted 11/20/2017 3:28 pm
