| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,612 |
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Yep, it's an Uncirculated Set, not a Proof Set. Hence it would not contain an "S" Mint nickel.
The "missing S" variety would ONLY be in a Proof Set.
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
 to the forum! You have a "Mint set" not a "proof" set. The no MM is a Philly issue. If you had a coin with no MM of S in a plastic Proof, then it would be worth something.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
 Keep asking such great questions.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Mint set because of the blue stripe on the cello? NO -Because proof sets were in plastic cases in 71. And the SanFran mint quit producing the business strike nickel with their MM in 70 ( minted with the S from 68-70)
Edited by Mark1959 12/05/2017 7:28 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
2 Posts |
Ok thank you all for the info. So the other coins in the set would have been produced in San fransisco, since they have the -S MM? The nickel would have been from Philadelphia then, if I am understanding the MM?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
536 Posts |
In that set, there should be only one "S" coin, the cent. All the others in that sleeve are from Philadelphia. (There may be another sleeve from Denver.) The address on the envelope just indicates the assembly point of the process.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
Yeah, I need clarification. Only one of the cents should have an S mintmark. It should be a Philly mint set (blue edges). The Denver set has red edges.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020 In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020 In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,612 |
|