Well, 0.2-0.3 g means 0.25 g, not 0.15 g, so it's not that underweight. (I checked with a better scale and it was actually 0.24 grams.)
Does the "typical of this place and time" comment mean that you agree with it more likely being Norman Sicily than something else entirely?
(Incidentally, you seem to have a contradiction - you attribute "Fractional Follaros" both to Ruggero I and William I, while saying that the former was the only one. Is the latter mention supposed to refer to some other denomination?)
[EDIT: thanks for the help anyway! I hoped that the gibberish could be matched to some known type, but even if it isn't and this is an unofficial imitation, it's still an interesting coin either way.]
Does the "typical of this place and time" comment mean that you agree with it more likely being Norman Sicily than something else entirely?
(Incidentally, you seem to have a contradiction - you attribute "Fractional Follaros" both to Ruggero I and William I, while saying that the former was the only one. Is the latter mention supposed to refer to some other denomination?)
[EDIT: thanks for the help anyway! I hoped that the gibberish could be matched to some known type, but even if it isn't and this is an unofficial imitation, it's still an interesting coin either way.]
Edited by january1may
04/20/2018 1:05 pm
04/20/2018 1:05 pm





















