| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,019 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1450 Posts |
I looks different than the other 1960's I have and from all I have read I believe this is the small date. Do you concur? 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1952 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1713 Posts |
Edited by arthrene 06/16/2008 11:01 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1450 Posts |
arthrene, that is my rationale also. Any other opinions? Please? I really want to be sure.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
57 Posts |
I concur with arthrene. The pic is taken at a slight angle but I like the looks of the 6. Especially the tail end of the six stops short.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19948 Posts |
Another vote for the 6 in the date, small.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1943 Posts |
The picture is the 60D small date. I agree.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1424 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
417 Posts |
The numerals are thicker, it's a small date. The numerals are a bit thinner on the large dates. Plus, all the hubbub about the 6 ;)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
 Small date
|
|
Valued Member
United States
164 Posts |
Did everyone note the doubling of the numerals. I think that is what is causing the hesitation to call it a small date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
Good eye on the numerals! I agree with small date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
543 Posts |
I agree with the small date.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,019 |
|