| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,355 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11904 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Knockout for sure, but I'm guessing it's a 58 "slider". Hope I'm wrong.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
I agree with Coinfrog. I was thinking it could be 64 but doesn't look lustrous enough so maybe 58 or 58+?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I am not seeing any wear in those pictures, and the cheek looks pretty mark-free. MS-65 for me.
Edited by Joseph7420 05/06/2018 11:57 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
I think the photo quality or lack there of is making this one look worse than it is. MS-64 is my guess.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
186 Posts |
MS-64. In addition to few marks on the cheek, there's luster visible at the top of that feature, and its usually the first place where the luster breaks away on a Morgan.
Edited by yelimsexa 05/07/2018 1:15 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11904 Posts |
This also came  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
If not 65! Tell us about the luster on this one, please.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11904 Posts |
luster looks unbroken and uniform. would not characterize it as booming though. other morgans have brighter luster. this seems like an earlier die strike from the quality of the fields.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,355 |
|