| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 3,633 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6116 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Gee, what's the first thing one should notice? The true image of both strikes! Immediate suspect a reversed image on a coin! Nice example Bats! I often wonder if an example like this isn't a slight "mint assisted error. A coin flips out wrong and the employee tosses it back into the supply hopper for a second trip? It could just flip around yea, but usually those cause other errors, being the feed mechanisms and collar movement would prevent most coins from an immediate second hit.?  Edited by Crazyb0
05/18/2018 3:33 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
262 Posts |
However it happened, that is cool.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1695 Posts |
Great-looking coin. Congratulations.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
420 Posts |
Very cool..! I can see why you got it..
Swamp
|
|
Valued Member
United States
260 Posts |
Awesome coin! Congrats on a beauty
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74818 Posts |
Very nice! That's a beauty! I would love to own something like that.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1479 Posts |
Bats...where on Gods green earth do you come up with coins like this? Super cool and oh ya slabbed PCGS a winner!
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
I just REALLY noticed the outline of the first details are still there! Gotta be because that was the stretched tensor point(elasticity), sorry guys, I get off on the science behind this! Notice the outline of the date, thought the field and second bust. These errors don't come by that often!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6116 Posts |
Thanks folks, it is a pretty trippy coin. I find it hard to photograph through a slab but even parts of the IN GOD WE TRUST are visible in the field by the date. Other than it being a) rare and b) a very attractive example, I thought that the full secondary date being visible really just was the kicker. I just happened to show up at the coin shop today and they had just got this back from PCGS and thought, correctly, that I might be interested in it. Right place at the right time. In the last three days I found by searching 1988 RDV006, 1999 WAM, 1956-D RPM-001, 1954 RPM-001, 1936 obverse Cud 05, etc. (it's been a good run lately) but this thing is just so neat I keep pulling it out and giving it another look. |
|
Pillar of the Community
967 Posts |
Nice pick up. I found a somewhat similar 1996 cent. I posted about 6 years ago. Yours is a bit stronger. http://goccf.com/t/131341 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74818 Posts |
Quote:In the last three days I found by searching 1988 RDV006, 1999 WAM, 1956-D RPM-001, 1954 RPM-001, 1936 obverse Cud 05, etc. (it's been a good run lately) but this thing is just so neat I keep pulling it out and giving it another look. Congratulations on those very nice and awesome finds! Do you plan on keeping the 1999 Wide AM for your collection or are you going to sell it? You have definitely have been having great luck lately!  Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6116 Posts |
I'm keeping the 99 WAM for now. I sold the one I previously found as it was roughly MS-66 and someone else wanted it more than I did. So for now I'm going to keep this one to fill that hole in my collection but honestly it's maybe MS but with lots of staining so not optimal eye appeal and probably wouldn't grade very well. Going a lot slower tonight as I am rarity hunting for oddball stuff like 1990 DDO-001 and not hitting on much but two Retained Cuds. And then...just scored my long-searched for 1983 DDR-002 in about MS-62. I'll post it tomorrow (later today it would seem at this point). Edited by tropicalbats
05/19/2018 12:39 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74818 Posts |
Well, good luck to you tropicalbats and congratulations on the finds! I wish the best of luck to you.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote:
First set of front/back images are the first strike, second set is the second strike. II think you have that backward. The first part has the second strike vertically oriented, the second pair has the first strike vertically oriented. |
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,633 |
Posted 05/18/2018 3:38 pm
