Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1958 US Nickel Possible Die Crack On The Reverse

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 818Next Topic  
New Member

United States
20 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2018  7:16 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Kenny181 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Can somebody please tell me if this is a major die crack on the reverse of my 1958 nickel, and also possible doubling on the date. I'm brand new so please bear with me. Thank you for your patience and your time.
New Member
United States
20 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2018  7:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kenny181 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

1958-US-Nickel-Possible-Die-Crack-On-The-Reverse
1958-US-Nickel-Possible-Die-Crack-On-The-Reverse
1958-US-Nickel-Possible-Die-Crack-On-The-Reverse
1958-US-Nickel-Possible-Die-Crack-On-The-Reverse
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2018  7:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TNG to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks more like a lamination. The coin peeled or flaked under striking. Usually happens with a faulty mixture in the blank planchet. A die crack would be raised on the coin in the exact shape of the crack on the die.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2018  7:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TNG to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Oh and :=)
Valued Member
wadahek's Avatar
United States
142 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2018  8:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wadahek to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm with TNG on this one. It looks like lamination, but good eyes noting something different about it either way!
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34430 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2018  9:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes that is a lam, but I don't see any doubling on the date. A clearer pic would help.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2018  9:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What is the difference? That is probably your question. A lamination is a planchet issue. A die die crack is a die issue. A lamination will have more value than a die crack. But don't put in your notice to retire. It is a very small premium. Crack, pretty common.
I would call the lamination an error. The die crack more of a die event. (not in a good way)

  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 818Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.24 seconds to rattle this change. Forums