| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,452 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
Hello CCF, Your thoughts are appreciated! Thanks,  
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Let me take a guess,AU-55? John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Tough call for sure. Can't get a good feel on this one. No less than AU-58.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
116 Posts |
Pictures of the same coin taken 5 months ago...  
|
|
Valued Member
United States
115 Posts |
MS-64 it's a beautiful coin. Looks uncirculated?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
What about the weakness above the ear? John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18685 Posts |
AU58. not a fan of the eye appeal
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36826 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
With new pictures, I think AU-58
|
|
Valued Member
240 Posts |
I think it looks better with the new pictures. This is why it is so hard to grade based on photos. There are so many variables that come into play.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
475 Posts |
Weakness above the ear can be quite common on MS coins for certain years and mints. So, it is not by itself an indication of circulation or uncirculated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,452 |
|