| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,453 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1530 Posts |
Have a guess as to the grade. I'll post results tomorrow at lunch (12:00pm). Thanks for looking.  |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1923 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
683 Posts |
IMO MS-62 but Probably NGC MS-63+
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Korea, Republic Of
1881 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
MS-63+. Too bad about the distracting marks. Great luster though.
Edited by TheCoinHunter
06/14/2018 1:57 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
867 Posts |
MS64....I'm thinking some of that great original lustre offsets some the field chatter present on the obv. On the other hand, I can see a strict grader knocking this down to a MS62
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
291 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1530 Posts |
Those two distracting marks are actually part of the silver, it's nothing on the surface of the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1622 Posts |
Quote:
Those two distracting marks are actually part of the silver, it's nothing on the surface of the coin That doesn't make any sense. If it's 'part of the silver' its on the coin. Looks MS-62 to me |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree. Can't see it getting a higher grade with those spots, which really detract from the eye appeal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1530 Posts |
The NGC Results are: NGC-MS63.
Thanks for guessing everyone.
Johnnysprawl,what I meant about the marks being part of the silver was that they weren't marks sitting on top of the surface that could possibly be conserved by NCS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
Did NGC/NCS offer to conserve it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1530 Posts |
No they didn't offer to conserve it this time around.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,453 |
|
Posted 06/14/2018 1:28 pm
