Quote:
Nothing like the awesome photos that Heritage takes. Of course, they charge more for that!
Nothing like the awesome photos that Heritage takes. Of course, they charge more for that!
The top Heritage picture isn't really bad. The 2003 one yes their pictures were terrible back then that's no secret, they improved them over the years though. They give you a lot more than photos though which you are paying whatever agreed upon rate for. You get live auctions, lot viewings, most things have some description or at the very least population information, have a larger buying base, and market their auctions.
There's a reason why the top collections sell at Heritage, Legend or Stacks and why GC isn't getting million dollar coins or many six figure coins ect.
Quote:
Also, a few weeks ago I was watching a coin on GC with the exact same grade and holder as one for sale at a fixed price at DL, since I was interested in it...it sold for more on GC even before the buyer's fees than what the same coin is listed for on DL.
Also, a few weeks ago I was watching a coin on GC with the exact same grade and holder as one for sale at a fixed price at DL, since I was interested in it...it sold for more on GC even before the buyer's fees than what the same coin is listed for on DL.
No two coins are alike unless you're talking about a modern 69/70 type thing. Of course somethings will sell for a little more there and some will sell for the same price no matter where you put it, that doesn't negate the criticism that consignors have made. Of course buyers love it, they get things cheap or outright steals more often than they should there. Bad photos, smaller buying base with a lot of dealers being part of it, lack of attention and descriptions, those are all good for the buyers where it keeps prices down but that's not what you want as a consignor.
Something else to consider the GC consignor almost certainly paid a bigger fee than the DL one did.
Edited by basebal21
07/24/2018 9:50 pm
07/24/2018 9:50 pm



























