| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,274 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
591 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
To me the first one is much better , AU-50ish . My only concern is the small black areas on coin in tight spots indicating possible cleaning . however the fields don't show a cleaning . Forget the 2nd coin . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
 I like the first one better also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
 first coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
591 Posts |
Thanks all. I just purchased the first coin! I'm not sure but the seller may have mispriced this one. For this grade, it was only $35. Hoping it looks as good in hand.
Edited by one_fine_dime 11/28/2018 12:08 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11901 Posts |
#1 looks au50 to me with a wonderful strike. would have gone up a notch or two if the coin showed more luster. nice!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
I like the first one better.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
First one looks best to me as well, 45/50.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
I'm the only one who would have taken the 2nd coin. I think that coin would "clean" up nicely with some acetone. That being said, I'd be in at about $15.00 for the 2nd coin. The fist coin looks cleaned in the 1st 2 pics. How much was the 2nd coin? Thanks
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
591 Posts |
@bandsdean, I can appreciate that! I think the reverse on the 2nd coin is certainly in AU territory, whereas I think the 1st coin reverse is likely XF. If the obverse toning looked more like the reverse (2nd coin), I would have been more likely to pick it up. I am impressed by your optimism on using acetone. I feel I've tried acetone in similarly toned coins and it does nothing. You can pick up the 2nd coin here for $108 (also listed on ebay): https://www.executivecoin.com/produ...mercury-dimeI like crusty original surfaces, but in the end, opinions posted here helped me decide to skip it as resale would likely be a challenge with that negative eye appeal. ( https://www.PCGS.com/eyeappeal). I don't think $15 is the right value, as the grade is certainly AU!, but this coin likely won't command $100+ due to this somewhat extreme toning. As far as cleaning on the first coin, I know it is possible. From the pics it seems like there is still intact luster and a harsh cleaning would have likely destroyed that (right?) so if any cleaning, it seems it was minor. The seller said this when I asked about potential cleaning: " There is some dirt/grime in the recesses of the numbers/letters, and around the portrait on the obverse, with the same going on the reverse. If I had to guess, it may have been cleaned with isopropyl alcohol which will remove surface dirt, and not affect the metal itself as well as leaving the luster alone. There are no obvious cleaning scratches, so if it was cleaned, then they did a good job."
Edited by one_fine_dime 11/29/2018 11:35 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
Am I the only one who thinks the first coin looks warped? Perhaps it's just the photos, but it looks off from a true circle, noticeable at the 1 o'clock position.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
591 Posts |
@merclover - I have the coin in hand, it doesn't seem warped at all, I think it was just the photo.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,274 |
|