Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

More Information About This Roman Coin...

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,167Next Topic  
Valued Member
pdg's Avatar
New Zealand
89 Posts
 Posted 12/01/2018  04:50 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add pdg to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I'd love to know more about this coin. I assume it's Roman Republic with Janus on the obverse and a ship's prow on the reverse. Diameter 31mm and it's heavy enough to use as a weapon.
I wonder what the denomination is, what the stroke (like a 1 or I) at the top of the obverse and reverse signifies, and whether the date given on a label with the coin is correct (it's given as 211-207 BC, which seems very precise...).
Ancients are not my forte so I can't even be sure it's genuine, though there's nothing about its provenance to make me suspicious.
Thanks!
More-Information-About-This-Roman-Coin...
More-Information-About-This-Roman-Coin...
Pillar of the Community
Ben's Avatar
United Kingdom
4208 Posts
 Posted 12/01/2018  06:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ben to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The denomination is an 'As' and it should be roughly an ounce of copper, so very heavy for an ancient coin. As far as I know, that dash is part of Janus' head dress. If you look closely under the prow, you'll see [R]OMA written out. As for date, I don't know how these things get dated as not many have moneyers marks, but most seem to get labelled 'After 211BC'.

It looks authentic to me; has the corrosion that all of these seem to have. These issues were cast, so you should expect to find a seam on the edge, sprue marks and some softness to the features - in fact, there are incredibly few of these with good detail.
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34450 Posts
 Posted 12/01/2018  07:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
it's heavy enough to use as a weapon.


Not my area of expertise, but it looks like a great pick-up to me!
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
Bedrock of the Community
sel_69l's Avatar
Australia
21788 Posts
 Posted 12/01/2018  07:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sel_69l to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The fact that the genuine examples are cast makes it easier faker to exactly reproduce the production method.
That makes the fakes much harder to separate out.

I have an extensive 'black' collection of fake ancient coins, for my own education.

Nevertheless, a higher level of expertise than mine is required to positively identify this one as fake or not.

I my humble opinion, I will go with genuine.
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 12/01/2018  2:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree the coin does appear to be genuine. Crawford is the reference used for this type: here is an online version: http://davy.potdevin.free.fr/Site/crawford1.html
Valued Member
pdg's Avatar
New Zealand
89 Posts
 Posted 12/02/2018  05:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pdg to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Great, thanks for your help everyone! @Ben, it does have what appears to be a seam, which made me a little suspicious initially. I didn't know the Romans cast some of their coins ... you learn something every day here
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,167Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums