| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 779 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
119 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff to clarify topic title. ***Is the mark between the date and mint mark an error or is it damage? Thanks. 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5239 Posts |
Edited by Jim0815 01/06/2019 6:54 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
119 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not a Cud, but a retained internal die break I'm thinking. Very unusual. We need coop or other experts to comment.  to the CCF!
Edited by Coinfrog 01/06/2019 7:02 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5239 Posts |
Coinfrog, you're right, wrong terminology on my part.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
119 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74662 Posts |
It's a Retained Interior Die Break.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6116 Posts |
I would suggest that it may be a little too rectilinear for a die break. Always difficult to be sure with a photo but looks more like a lifted small lamination plate between the devices. More common around LIBERTY (and often confused for a BIE), but it happens around the date as well.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
 To the Forum. Please upload a full pic of the coin.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
119 Posts |
Here are top and bottom pictures of the coin. I couldn't fit the whole coin in my field of view.  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74662 Posts |
Not a Lamination peel. It is a Interior Die Break.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3662 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
119 Posts |
Thank you very much everyone...:)
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 779 |
|