Hey Johnny,
The first set of photos were taken on a very natural sunny day on a window ledge (Iphone)
The last photo was taken in a dark space with photo flashlight on (iphone)
So, in reality the first set of photos are more of a clear indication on the actual coin and what details you see there are the actual details of this coin. .
Personally I thought CCCS has graded this properly at EF40 maybe it could have been EF45 and a long shot at an expert opinion for AU50.
The details shown on the first set of photos are the actual details in the coin. Iphone 8 is not intented to show clear details within an encapsulated slab.
I may at some point sent it over at ICCS just for the heck of it. According to the grading standards this coin does have all of the criteria for EF.
If you feel that photography and lightning alters the appearance of the coin than you should also feel the last photo is also playing tricks with your mind:)
The first set of photos were taken on a very natural sunny day on a window ledge (Iphone)
The last photo was taken in a dark space with photo flashlight on (iphone)
So, in reality the first set of photos are more of a clear indication on the actual coin and what details you see there are the actual details of this coin. .
Personally I thought CCCS has graded this properly at EF40 maybe it could have been EF45 and a long shot at an expert opinion for AU50.
The details shown on the first set of photos are the actual details in the coin. Iphone 8 is not intented to show clear details within an encapsulated slab.
I may at some point sent it over at ICCS just for the heck of it. According to the grading standards this coin does have all of the criteria for EF.
If you feel that photography and lightning alters the appearance of the coin than you should also feel the last photo is also playing tricks with your mind:)
Edited by Coin-Flipper
01/17/2019 09:56 am
01/17/2019 09:56 am




















