| Author |
 Replies: 36 / Views: 5,000 |
|
|
|
New Member
United States
32 Posts |
Good morning, Malissa. I was not blessed with the high relief
1951. Even the chrome plated ones have some of that worn off, but still in great condidtion. This is a common ordinary set with common ordinary nickels in it. The 64 has the right amount of water lines. It's just a set of nickels.
Bill
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1931 Posts |
OK, This is only an estimate, so please don't make any type of sales without getting a bit more verification. I am going to go about this in this manner:
1922-1950 at vf
1951-1969 at xf
1970 -1983 at au
of course the value can be different depending on individual grades of each coin (especially in the key dates)
so my estimates for the complete set (assuming I have the grades correct and that you haven't missed a rarity) would be between $550-$700. I hope that helps you somewhat. Maybe some of the others will chime in and give a yes or no agreement to this estimate but I believe that they feel as I do..... it is very hard to give a value estimate without seeing the coins themselves.
malissa
|
|
New Member
United States
32 Posts |
Malissa, who woulda thunk't! I bought it back in 1999 I
think for, maybe 35.00 or 95.00. From a dealer and it was in a big square white plastic holder, even! One of those two amounts. Are you sure about this, like with your decimal pts, etc? I mean these are just common ordinary nickels in
very good shape. All the early 30 yrs are F-VF. Very pretty!
Are you really sure? I'm astounded! Please--say something more!
Bill S.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1931 Posts |
hi bill,
It could possibly be more as well. Where the value goes up is if you have 1925 even in vg $90, f12 $125, vf20 $175
the 1926 far 6 is worth vg8 $175, f $250, vf $400. These are of course charlton values, which the book states is for graded coins, so you would need to make some determination of how much to deduct from the value since the coins are not professionally graded.
I never asked if you had the 1947 with the dot on it as I didnt include that in my estimate and that would make the set worth more.
|
|
New Member
United States
32 Posts |
Malissa, I have extras: 1922(3) 1923(2) 1924(2) 1925(1) 1926
Near6(2) 1927(2) 1928(1) 1929(1) 1930(2) 1931(1)with luster
32,33,34,35,36(1 each). I won't offer the set to the guy. I had an old 1984 Charlton and gave it to him. I will keep my full set of cents, too. He's ordering a new Charlton and we are getting together when it comes. You have been very enlightening and helpful and I appreciate it. I have to get outside and get some wood cut, will talk with you later. Thank you VERY much
Bill S.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
Bill, what do you plan on doing with the extras? I haven't checked mine,but I'm sure there are some that will fit my folder, (nickels). thanks. Later: I just checked, and mine only go back to '61, so I have a long way to go yet. Gort all them trees cut yet? I know there is a bunch waiting!  Dick Edited by livingdinasaur
08/23/2008 02:47 am
|
|
New Member
United States
32 Posts |
Hey, Dick: I think the extras I picked up at the coin show when they were still cheap. I worked on the trees some Tuesday last week, but came down with terrible stomach virus in the woods and was laid up for four days straight, Just now enjoying food again. The 1925 nickel extra I have is LOST, somewhere in this house, but LOST! I showed it to Jan and
I may have spent it somewhere between her quilt room and my penny room. I called the boy up I am selling my canada stuff and told him he may not want this set to buy after Malissa told me it's value. He agreed, lol
Bill S.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4541 Posts |
wow we really have gotten off topic
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1931 Posts |
lol! sorry daviscfad. this thread kind of took off just like my brain normally does. more than one direction at a time. Did you find anything interesting in your nickels?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
umm just the oldest like I said being a 1937 few 40s 50s 60s Lots of 70s and 80s. I have to check the 64 s for the extra water line. How did you say you could determine that? I will have to check your email again
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
ooppss I am sorry 1932 was the oldest I found
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
Malissa Thanks for all your help! I did find 2 1964 coins with extra water mark THANK GOD! First errors I have found searching circulated coins! very exciting  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
well this is what I found!
1932; 1
1937; 2
1940: 1
1941: 1
1947: 1
1950; 3
1955; 3
1956; 1
1957; 2
1958; 2
1959; 4
1960; 14
1961; 22
1962; 16
1963; 57
1964; 121
1964 Extra water Mark on reverse under FG: 2
1965; 127
1966; 42
1967; 5
1968; 234
1969; 80
1970; 7
1971; 54
1972; 173
1973; 169
1974; 247
1975; 308
1976; 189
1977; 292
1978; 425
1979; 561
1980; 458
1981; 354
2006; 1
2007; 1
2008; 1
Edited by daviscfad
09/04/2008 6:13 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
Bill, I just re read this thread. I sent you an email,
Dick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
congrats on those '64 XWL!  |
| |
Replies: 36 / Views: 5,000 |
First Page
Posted 08/18/2008 10:32 am
