Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

What's With All The Copper?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,918Next Topic  
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
460 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2019  7:18 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Sharkman to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
As far as I can tell, every circulation strike U.S. coin is copper or alloyed with copper (I admit this may not be completely true of the zinc pennies). Gold and silver coins are 10% copper alloyed, thereby diminishing their value as specie. There must be a reason. It may be as simple as durability.

Nickels are 75% copper, but are much harder than other coins, I assume because of the nickel content. Are they still 75% copper because nickel costs more?

Then we've got small cents. After retiring copper nickel small cents, it would have been a simple matter to return to all copper like the copper large cents. Instead a bronze alloy of 95% copper was used. Once again, I am guessing the alloy made the coin harder and more durable than just copper.

Finally, there's the clad coins: hard copper-nickel plating over a softer core of copper, with the copper, I assume saving cost over using more nickel.

So, being a curious sort, I wonder why all of these different alloys have been used, and why copper has been in all of them.

Any thoughts?
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
GrapeCollects's Avatar
United States
8938 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2019  8:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GrapeCollects to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is as you said for durability.
Pillar of the Community
Finn235's Avatar
United States
6130 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2019  11:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Finn235 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Pure nickel is magnetic. Again, except for the 1943 cent and maybe a few patterns, the US has never made a magnetic coin, and magnets are usually step 1 in pulling foreign coins out of industrial coin counters. Adding copper to the alloy negates the magnetic properties.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2019  08:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Or someone in the Government owns a lot of Copper mines.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187860 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2019  10:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, adding copper to gold and silver makes the coin more durable.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2019  3:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
As far as I can tell, every circulation strike U.S. coin is copper or alloyed with copper .... There must be a reason. It may be as simple as durability.

To a large part that is the reason. Also the coinage metals traditionally are fairly dense, their density and weight in ancient times indicating their value. (Most common metals are significantly less dense than copper, silver, or gold. The exception being lead which due to its softness is unsuited for coinage. But useful in making "hefty" counterfeits.)


Quote:
Nickels are 75% copper, but are much harder than other coins, I assume because of the nickel content.

Correct.


Quote:
Are they still 75% copper because nickel costs more?

They were originally 75% copper because at the time the alloy was developed nickel was more expensive (allowing the coins to still have an intrinsic value close to face value) and coins of higher nickel content would have been too hard to strike. Even with improved dies and better control of annealing the planchets reducing the copper content would still be very hard on dies today.


Quote:
After retiring copper nickel small cents, it would have been a simple matter to return to all copper like the copper large cents. Instead a bronze alloy of 95% copper was used. Once again, I am guessing the alloy made the coin harder and more durable than just copper.

Correct again, the bronze alloy was significantly more durable than pure copper would have been. (hence the reason the romans had bronze swords and not copper ones. It wasn't called the bronze age for nothing.)


Quote:
Finally, there's the clad coins: hard copper-nickel plating over a softer core of copper, with the copper, I assume saving cost over using more nickel.

The clad composition came about for several reasons, one of the main being as an anti-counterfeiting measure. But the copper core also helped the coin more closely match the electromagnetic signature of the silver coins. Today it does have the advantage of being cheaper than a solid 75/25 copper nickel alloy would be.


Quote:
why copper has been in all of them.

Copper is not a precious metal, but it is a fairly common "semi-precious" one. It has several physical properties than make it ideal for coinage. If it wasn't so common, and didn't corrode so readily, it would have been considered a precious metal as well. At least in ancient times.


Quote:
Or someone in the Government owns a lot of Copper mines.

That's how we got nickel in our coinage, political influence on behalf of the owner of the only nickel mine in the US
Edited by Conder101
02/22/2019 3:29 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,918Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums