Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Copper Sintered Nickel?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 5,645Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Nelrak's Avatar
United States
974 Posts
 Posted 08/11/2008  01:10 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Nelrak to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I have this nickel and after researching online, I believe it to be Copper Sintered. I almost thought it was a wrong planchet nickel on cent when I first saw it but it's definitely nickel diameter.

The best definition I have found for this "Mint Error" is:


Quote:
"Sintering: The welding together of small particles of metal by applying heat below the melting point. Typically occurs during the annealing process of coin planchets when the annealing drum has not properly cleaned and minute amounts of the previous medal (like copper) are left behind in the drum. Notable examples are the sintering of nickel coins were copper adheres to the nickel finish of a planchet giving it a gold tint or copper colored finish."

Anyone care to comment?

Copper-Sintered-Nickel?
Copper-Sintered-Nickel?
Edited by Nelrak
08/11/2008 5:46 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187950 Posts
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 08/11/2008  6:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is unwise for me to suggest with 100% certainty that this coin is struck on a sintered planchet without having looked at it closely.

It does appear to be.

I would only caution that in some lines of work, lithography, for example, chemicals are used that deposit copper onto other metals.

I suspect that this coin is indeed struck on a sintered planchet but I wanted to mention the other possibility.

Thanks,
Bill
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts
 Posted 08/11/2008  10:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mikediamond to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It looks like an authentic improper annealing error. However the "sintered planchet" and "copper wash" scenarios are examples of numismatic mythology. No one appears to understand why a copper layer forms on coins that are baked too long (or at too high a temperature) in the annealing oven. Since some of these nickels are appreciably underweight, an added layer of copper is a non-starter. There are many other objections to the sintering scenario, but it would take several pages to go into them all. Perhaps the copper fraction of the alloy migrates to the surface. Perhaps the nickel fraction migrates to the interior, leaving the copper fraction at the surface. Perhaps the nickel fraction is liberated, leaving the copper fraction behind. Perhaps the copper fraction is liberated and re-deposited as a pure layer. I really don't know. Even a metallurgist I talked to can't figure it out.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 08/11/2008  10:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Mike,

Thanks for going into that part of it. After my thread on the 1949 S cent, I wasn't ready to tread these waters :-)

Have Fun,
Bill
Pillar of the Community
Nelrak's Avatar
United States
974 Posts
 Posted 08/12/2008  10:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Nelrak to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Mike and Bill. So I take it this would not be something TPG Companies would be able to confirm? It does have some nice eye appeal.
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts
 Posted 08/12/2008  10:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mikediamond to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
They slab these all the time. The label varies, however. Sometimes it's called "improperly annealed", sometimes "sintered plating", and sometimes "copper wash". It's a reflection of their uncertainty over the etiology of this error.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187950 Posts
 Posted 08/12/2008  10:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you, Bill and Mike, this has been an interesting read.
Bedrock of the Community
BadThad's Avatar
United States
19935 Posts
 Posted 08/12/2008  3:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BadThad to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Beautiful coin!
Lincoln Cent Lover!
VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR
https://verdi.care/
Pillar of the Community
chuckster 125's Avatar
United States
4113 Posts
 Posted 08/24/2008  02:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chuckster 125 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nelrak- Great looking Coin!



Here are pics of 2 Jeff Nickels I have, one is a 89P and the other is a 2004P, both are copper colored, how can you tell if this is naturally toning or they have been sintered?

The 89P I've had since 1989 (Nice Steps) and the 2004P I just found a few days ago in rolls.

Image: Copper-Sintered-Nickel? 1989PJeffersonObvjpeg1.jpg
37.9 KB

Image: Copper-Sintered-Nickel? 1989PJeffersonRevjpeg1.jpg
44.56 KB

Image: Copper-Sintered-Nickel? 1989PNiceltonedstepsjpeg3.jpg
51.65 KB

Image: Copper-Sintered-Nickel? 2004PJeffersonjpeg2.jpg
48.64 KB

Image: Copper-Sintered-Nickel? 2004PJeffersonRevjpeg1.jpg
58.93 KB
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts
 Posted 08/24/2008  08:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mikediamond to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Again, I prefer the term "improperly annealed", since the sintering scenario is unworkable. Anyway, your two coins look like legitimate examples. Both retain original mint luster, which is key.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Pillar of the Community
chuckster 125's Avatar
United States
4113 Posts
 Posted 08/24/2008  12:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chuckster 125 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Mike!


I'll try to remember to refer to these as "Improperly Annealed" from now on and avoid using the word sintered.

Thanks again,

Chuck.
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 5,645Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums