| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,409 |
|
|
New Member
Australia
6 Posts |
Edited by Zippyzee 02/28/2019 12:43 am
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
17901 Posts |
Hello Zippyzee and  ! Please could you post larger photos of both sides of the coin? From the one small photo you've posted I can't even tell whether it's a 5c, 10c or 20c piece. It may also help to indicate the weight and diameter if these are different from normal coins of the same denomination. Thanks! It is probably just PMD (post-mint damage) but we need clearer photos to see exact what is going on!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21589 Posts |
 . To the CCF Would you please post cropped photos of both sides. It looks like it is intentional damage but would like to see both sides to confirm.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
  to the CCF!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16809 Posts |
It doesn't look like a mint error, given that I have a reasonably good imagination and can't imagine how such a thing could possibly be made in the mint. It therefore seems reasonable that it's "post-mint damage" or, in this case, "post-mint artwork", since the damage seems to be deliberately artistic in nature.
Non-mint-error "funny-looking coins" are not usually considered valuable or collectable by coin collectors, but you might find some artistic types who would be prepared to pay more than face value / scrap metal value for it.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Surely a deliberate disfiguration.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1333 Posts |
would be funny if someone did it to a fifty cent.
|
|
New Member
 Australia
6 Posts |
its a 10 cent piece. to me it looks like its not deliberately done. its very interesting.
|
|
New Member
 Australia
6 Posts |
sorry photo was too small photo now uploaded at a better size. tell me your thoughts please
|
|
New Member
 Australia
6 Posts |
look at the queens side there is no edging around the coin only built up metal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
852 Posts |
An easy thing to whack grooves on the rim of one side with the other undamaged by putting it on a piece of wood. Worth 10 cents
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1364 Posts |
I agree that it is PMD (Post Mint Damage). I would say that, because of the regularity of the spacing of the grooves around the rim and on one side only, that the coin has been subjected to some kind of machine cog interference (similar to an old fashioned can opener but on a much larger scale). An interesting find though ... keep looking! #128515;
Edited by coaster 02/28/2019 07:52 am
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
102 Posts |
I'm not so sure it's PMD. Isn't the lettering too far in from the edge.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4691 Posts |
To me it looks like someone had too much time on their hands and tooled it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
9376 Posts |
Quote:I'm not so sure it's PMD. Isn't the lettering too far in from the edge. I just compared it to one of my pics and it looks like the writing is the same distance from the edge. Steve 
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,409 |
|