| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,241 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
50 Posts |
Took new pics of this as experiment to see if picture is better than the last time. Is this better?   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11880 Posts |
coin looks harshly cleaned
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1339 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
Obverse is better pic, too much light reflection on the reverse me thunks. The coin... what a shame.
I would say atleast a 63 if it had not been destroyed.
Edited by NDBirdman
03/04/2019 8:43 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
This Morgan has a lot going on, roller wheel marks, finger prints and hairlines. AU details due to the hairlines on the left reverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
MS Details Harshly Cleaned
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
50 Posts |
Thank you all for the grades / comments. Can some of the unsightly hairlines be planchet striations?
Would MS be MS60, the lowest MS because of the cleaning? If it was AU, doesn't that mean it was circulated for a time?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8938 Posts |
AU Indicates Circulation correct. The reason we just use MS is because a cleaned or altered coin cannot be givin a numerical grade. By catagorizing it, it makes it easier to express. Think of MS Details as Uncirculated Details.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18660 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36741 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,241 |
|
Posted 03/04/2019 8:22 pm
