1961 DDO-001 Proof Roosvevelt Dime Yes Or No

I don't think it is 001 and I am leaning towards MD. Let's wait for a pro to chime in.
John1

The lighting makes it very difficult to evaluate this coin.

I can't see any of the notching or separation that DDO-001 has, but I do see MD on IN. Can you get pics of FS and he date? Those would be the two spots I would use to ID DDO-001, using IGWT only can be tricky especially if there is also MD.

Looks like a doubled die to me, but I'm new here so I'm not really sure. Curious to find out from pros if it is or isn't!

I tried to piece the images from Daves coin, Variety Vista and a normal Proof Dime:


While they are close, I feel it is a normal proof. The green arrows shows the miss match. (What is there/what should be there)

We are all here to help you. It is called "Coin Community Family". So it is a team effort. But thanks for the extra images. It actually confirms more that it is MD. Because the MD affected areas are reduced in size. On a doubled die, these devices would be enlarged.


Note the initials on these two.

Note on the doubled dies, the glare doesn't appear because the contour of the devices are there. On Machine Doubling it is common to see glare on the devices, as they are flatten with a step down on the affected devices. The FS-101 is not a strong DDO, as the 003 and 008. Machine Doubling can be more of a problem with proof coins as they are struck at least twice. (More even on larger coins) Sometimes you see what is called flat field doubling.

The first strike is partially flattened and looks flat on the field. Thus the term 'Flat Field Doubling'.