| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,170 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
133 Posts |
Edited by Mmansell45
06/27/2019 05:31 am
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
646 Posts |
Doesn't look like it to me, just damage. But I'll wait for someone else more knowledgeable to give their opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2376 Posts |
The mintmark looks to be close in position for 001 but with this amount of circulation damage and wear a positive id may not be possible
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4404 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2376 Posts |
Tanman , I am assuming the op was going after Coppercoins rpm#1
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4404 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2376 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
133 Posts |
Excuse my spelling the ball is in the bottom so it would be IMM-001. Right?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2376 Posts |
Tanman, you win !
Still not sure where the abbreviation IMM is listed but this is MMS-004 Trumpet tail or Serif mintmark style
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4404 Posts |
No, it has to be the ball serif mintmark style to be IMM-001, yours is the trumpet tail style. See the variety vista links I posted before.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Variety Vista 1946-S RPM-001 is the same as coppercoins 1946S-1mm-001 http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20L...6SRPM001.htmhttp://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/...ie_state=mdsI know this guy. LOLMost of the lower numbers are the same for the Two sites. Why? Because the coppercoins site used the numbers from the original RPM (Orange book) book.  When they reached the end of this publications listing, then they added their new numbers. (Some years they had duplicates in the book and these were removed from their listings. Mostly 1972 year Denver examples) |
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,170 |
|
Posted 06/27/2019 09:44 am
