Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Difference In Proof Dies Lincoln Cents

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,059Next Topic  
Valued Member
Haykalmdownfella's Avatar
United States
60 Posts
 Posted 09/03/2008  8:53 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Haykalmdownfella to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Is There a Difference In Proof Dies for the Proof Lincoln Cents for the 1950s? maybe 1940s? I know both were minted in Philadelphia but is there a way to tell a proof and a regular P mint cent apart if there both heavy circulated
Rest in Peace
biggfredd's Avatar
United States
9104 Posts
 Posted 09/04/2008  05:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biggfredd to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
From the field to the rim is a slope on circulation strikes, a sharp rise on proofs.
Valued Member
Haykalmdownfella's Avatar
United States
60 Posts
 Posted 09/04/2008  06:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Haykalmdownfella to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Is that the only way to tell? lol I'm looking at a 1969s proof and a 1969s and they look the same besides one is way thicker because its never been circulated

Looking does the thickness of the rim mean anything? it looks like on the proofs the edge when looking at the front of the coin is thinker then a regular coin does this mean anything or is then just done my circulation
Edited by Haykalmdownfella
09/04/2008 06:20 am
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 09/04/2008  10:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Proofs* should have thicker rims that are squared off, not more rounded like business strikes. The rims are thicker due to an increased striking pressure when minting proofs. The fields should be mirrored and basined(slightly concave, not flat) and the details should be much sharper than a business strike. Even on a worn example, there should still be some mirror visible in protected areas and the rims should be prominent.

*I am only referring to modern brilliant and cameo proofs. Matte proofs and 19th century proofs can be harder to discern when circulated and in some cases, downright difficult to tell apart from a business strike.

Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 09/04/2008  1:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
And with the economy the way it has been, robberies of coins has put many Proofs into circulation lately. And by the time they've gone through machines, peoples hands, dropped on floors, spit on for luck, left on bars with beer all over them, etc. By then a proof could look like anything except a proof. I too have found some that could or maybe have been a proof a long time ago.
Unfortunately criminals just spend coins as if they were coins.
Wonder if a coin criminal teaching forum could be started somewhere? How about how to collect coins in prisons?
New Member
United States
12 Posts
 Posted 09/04/2008  7:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kranky to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
FWIW, I met John Mercanti at a coin show a couple years ago and he said that current Lincoln proofs have higher relief than the circulation strikes. I have not been able to notice it myself.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 09/05/2008  10:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am inclined to agree. It could be an illusion, but the circulation strikes look very flat compared to the proofs.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,059Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums