| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,616 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
Did I get shafted on this 1916-D Buffalo nickel (PCGS MS63)? Should I resubmit? (SORRY FOR THE NOT SO GREAT PICTURES)   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
A little on the low side, I think a 64
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Don't bother resubmitting . I agree with PCGS .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
looks fine to me. Why do you think you might have been shafted?
|
|
Valued Member
79 Posts |
What are the lines on the face? gives a cleaned looked just to that area and the ones on the reverse buffalos shoulder areas? looked scratched?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5029 Posts |
From the pics looks like PCGS is right there.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
MS-63. Beautiful, but still 63.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36828 Posts |
I agree with the MS-63 also. Nice luster and color.
|
|
Moderator
United States
189185 Posts |
Quote:
Why do you think you might have been shafted? Curiosity got to me. I had to look at some of the price guides. It seems the jump from 63 to 64 justifies tolch123 asking the question. |
|
Forum Dad
United States
24170 Posts |
It's got some pretty deep hits.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3660 Posts |
Nice coin, above average Denver strike, good eye appeal. IMHO, MS-63 is spot on.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:
It seems the jump from 63 to 64 justifies tolch123 asking the question. On the flip side that jump is almost always the answer as well though |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18687 Posts |
I'm at MS63 also only because of the strike
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,616 |
|
Posted 11/05/2019 2:55 pm
