Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1862, 1863, And 1865 Indian Head Coin Thickness

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 2,520Next Topic  
New Member
Longtrack Lady's Avatar
United States
8 Posts
 Posted 12/08/2019  8:57 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Longtrack Lady to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Probably not a surprise to others, but it was a cool moment for me today. I was going through all the Indian Head penny's and realized that the 1862, and 1863 were a gram heavier than the others.

1862,-1863,-And-1865-Indian-Head-Coin-Thickness
1862,-1863,-And-1865-Indian-Head-Coin-Thickness

Dates in title and post corrected by Forum Mom. Also moved to Classic Coins forum.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 12/08/2019  9:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


Coins in 1865 were struck from a thinner bronze alloy than the copper-nickel cents produced into early 1864. Cents from 1864 exist in both varieties.



to the CCF!
Edited by Coinfrog
12/08/2019 10:19 pm
Pillar of the Community
fioti's Avatar
United States
4212 Posts
 Posted 12/08/2019  9:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fioti to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
In '64, the composition was changed to copper/tin, a change from the original copper/nickel.
Rest in Peace
T-BOP's Avatar
United States
18456 Posts
 Posted 12/08/2019  9:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add T-BOP to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To CCF , coinfrog said it all .
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 12/09/2019  09:57 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just 1 gram? Should be almost 1.5 grams The bronze versions, 95%copper 5% tin and zinc (1864 and later) were 3.11 grams. The coppernickel version, 88% copper 12% nickel (1859 - 1864) were 4.66 grams.
New Member
Longtrack Lady's Avatar
United States
8 Posts
 Posted 12/09/2019  12:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Longtrack Lady to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Great Insight all! The gram weight issue @Conder101... Could be a poor scale. There is definitely a big feel difference. Thanks for the feedback all!
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 2,520Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums