Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Medal_athena, 1842, J.e.dubois, Paris-Mint_information Request & Discussion

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,909Next Topic  
New Member
stoystown_pa's Avatar
41 Posts
 Posted 12/27/2019  11:12 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add stoystown_pa to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hello,

Here is one of my favorite medals that I have acquired two of; one Bronze. one Argent. The Argent (silver) one that I acquired, after aquiring the medal in Bronze, was mistakenly sold as a Bronze medal. Later weighing both medals I found their weights didn't agree! :)

Unfortunately a catalogue for the Paris Mint covering the medals made there is out of my affordability. So I am asking if anyone here owns, "Catalogue General Illustre des Editiones de la Monnaie de Paris.", or the "Paris Mint Catalogue", could you reference the Bronze and Argent medals? Or, if any one has come-across the silver medal on-line do you have a link or could you provide information you have found? I have found some information on the Bronze medal, but I can not find anything on the Argent one.

Here is what I think I know;

- The medal is called "ATHENA"

- The medal's obverse is struck in "High Relief". (I believe this is the correct terminology used in Numismatics). The helmet raises far above the rim which provides for a magnificent medalist's sculpture / presentation.

- Joesph Eugène DUBOIS, medalist who designed the engraving (1), obverse and the reverse. Struck / designed at the Paris Mint. J. E. Dubois is the patriarch of the famous medalist family Dubois.

Description:

Obverse: Bust of Athena in Corinthian helmet to R. The helmet has a leather web on the inside that can be seen below the helmet's edge. A Corinthian helmet is Greek.
Note: This obverse is often wrongly associated with Minerva. Minerva is Roman. Here is a nice link discussing some the differences between the two;

https://www.medalcollectors.org/doc...ay-FINAL.pdf


Reverse: Laurel Wreath tied with a ribbon. With no inscription in the field.

------

1. ARGENT, struck on plain edge rim - 1.308"/33.22mm Dia, 17.89g, 0.135"/ 3.43mm Thick Rim.

2. ReStrike, The first strike, 1820.

3. Paris Mint Mark, struck on plain edge rim - Believed (me) to be an Anchor and the letter "C", interlaced (C et ancre entrelaces) (?). Only the outline of the bottom of the die (anchor) was successfully incised. Used on all medals in all metals, Oct. 22, 1841 to Sept. 25, 1842.
Note: At this time it was difficult to stamp the rims of these medals and often times you are only left with an "outline". But these outlines can sometimes be distinctive/unique enough to attribute correctly.

4. Engraved by Joesph Eugène Dubois - (1795/1863), signed "DUBOIS" (1)

5. Other medals signed, E. Dubois (space) F, F is an abbreviation for France. Sometimes there is a super script "T" with the F which could refer to a Monnaie de Paris (Paris Mint) branch mint of; Nantes (T), 1797 - 1820; 1826 - 1835

6. E. Dubois went blind in 1846.

-------

1. BRONZE - 1.321"/ 33.55mm Dia, 15.3g, 0.105"/ 2.67mm Thick Rim

2. ReStrike, 1842. The first strike, 1820.

3. Paris Mint Mark - None, or could be the pointing hand outline (?). Used June 23, 1845 to Oct. 31, 1860.


Here are some photos of the Argent medal;

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion


NOTE: An interesting difference between the two medals is that they have different rim thicknesses. Here is a photo of the plain edges of them;


Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

GENERAL DISCUSSION AND QUESTONS;

I find it hard to envision how the hemet in this medal can raise above the rim on the obverse. It would seem to be reasonable to assume the planchets used for this raised feature could not have been from a flat planchet. But rather, from planchets that where especially made with an area on the surface of the planchet that was already raised before striking. The helmet then would be able to be completely formed without causing stress lines in the surrounding fields. To be able to flow into the recessed die (cavity) to complete/form the raised helmet surface.

Does this seem a reasonable inference? Is this common for high relief coins/medals for the planchet to have a surface that is partially pre-formed to facilitate the high relief strike?

Does any know where a plastic enclosed holder can be found for these high relief medals can be found?

FOOTNOTES:

(1). Here is a medal with the same obverse of a Corinthian helmeted bust of Athena to R. with a more complete signature of Joseph Eugene Dubois that I believe can be referenced to correctly identify/attribute "DUBOIS" on this medal as "E. Dubois". "E. DUBOIS" is how Joseph E. Dubois would usually sign his medals. (2). Also, being the patriarch of this Dubois family, it would not also be unreasonable that he would also sign some medals simply as Dubois without initials - as in this case.


Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion


The signature below the bust reads:


E - Dubois F - DE PUYMAURIN D -

(Dashes represent floating periods.)

1. E is for EUGENE
2. F is for FRANCE
3. D is for Direxit "at the direction of"

Puymaurin, Jean Casimir - Master of the Mint. (1816-1830), Died 1841.

... A large number of the medals issued at the Paris Mint during his (Puymaurin's) tenure of office bear beside the signature of the artist his own: "DE PULMAURIN D". (Baron de Puymurin Direxit) [Direxit - at the direction of]... Dubois, a medalist, worked under him at the Paris Mint, as did many others. (2)


(2). Vol. XVI, 1908 - SPINK & SON'S, monthly NUMISMATIC CIRCULAR, p 11520.


Finally for those of you left, here is a bust of Athena:

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

ROMAN, 2nd Century AD; found on the Esquiline Hill in ROME. Helmet and bust by Carlo Albacini, 1783; from the collection of Charles Townley.

In closing:

Medal_athena,-1842,-J.e.dubois,-Paris-Mint_information-Request-&-Discussion

Head of Athena / 400-380 BC.

Regards, Stoystown HAPPY NEW YEAR
Edited by stoystown_pa
12/28/2019 5:27 pm
Pillar of the Community
cointagous's Avatar
United States
1143 Posts
 Posted 12/28/2019  1:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cointagous to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A well thought out post with some great photo's for reference. So do you believe this to be a first strike as it lacks the C on later ones? Hopefully someone else can chime with additional information to confirm what you believe to be true.
New Member
stoystown_pa's Avatar
41 Posts
 Posted 12/28/2019  6:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add stoystown_pa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Cointagous,

Thanks of the your comments. No, I believe this coin was first struck in 1820 and would have had an unmarked rim. In 1820 the Paris Mint did not mark the edge of the medals that where struck there. The Paris Mint did not start marking the edges of medals with a material designation or mint marks until around 1841. So this medal would have been a restrike, if I am using that term correctly. I believe a restrike is when the original dies are used in a later production run of any medal.

But I do think if the same original obverse die is used with a different reverse that you would correctly call this new medal a restrike. Rather, the medal would be an original new coin with the obverse of the former medal. Although I have to say I'm not to clear on the term restrike.

Perhaps someone could comment on this technical detail?

What I was trying to say is that perhaps only a partial strike was made in the Argent coin's edge and the whole Anchor with the "C" was not successfully incised/marked in the rim by the die when struck. Only a partial mark was left.

I hope I said it more clearly this time.

Regards,
New Member
stoystown_pa's Avatar
41 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2020  4:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add stoystown_pa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi

I would like to make a correction for the meaning of the letter "F." after Dubois signature found in footnote (1). When I posted this I thought it stood for France but now I know that that is incorrect. To wit;

Signature abbreviations. Signatures sometimes contain arcane letters following the name or initials on medals. These reveal what part the signer had in the creation of that medallic item. Once these abbreviations are learned an entire division of labor is sometimes revealed. The most encountered is fecit, a Latin word (pronounced FEE-set) meaning he (or she) did it, or made it, or created it, or engraved it. The letters f or fec after a name or initials indicates this Latin term. It is used in medallic art more often than any other signature form. (3)

Reference:

(3). The Newman Numismatic Portal is located at Washington University in St. Louis, HOME / LIBRARY / DICTIONARY / SIGNATURE

Regards.
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12255 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2020  6:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I find it hard to envision how the hemet in this medal can raise above the rim on the obverse. It would seem to be reasonable to assume the planchets used for this raised feature could not have been from a flat planchet. But rather, from planchets that where especially made with an area on the surface of the planchet that was already raised before striking. The helmet then would be able to be completely formed without causing stress lines in the surrounding fields. To be able to flow into the recessed die (cavity) to complete/form the raised helmet surface.

Does this seem a reasonable inference? Is this common for high relief coins/medals for the planchet to have a surface that is partially pre-formed to facilitate the high relief strike?


@stoystwon_pa: Special planchets as you describe are not the norm. The planchets for high-relief medals are struck multiple times on flat planchets to bring up the relief and are struck under enough pressure to ensure the metal flow does fill in the high-relief elements of the design.

Here's a link to a post I made that discusses and illustrates the striking of a high-relief medal: Missouri Sesquicentennial Medal Process Set. Reviewing it should help you understand how your medal was produced.


Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
New Member
stoystown_pa's Avatar
41 Posts
 Posted 05/24/2020  5:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add stoystown_pa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi,

COMMEMS, thank you for taking time to reply and especially for how informative your reply is, as well as the great link sharing your knowledge. Step number 7 was especially intriguing because of how it reminded me of a Jefferson nickel I recently found in pocket change. I'm going to expound on that in a different forum where it may be more on topic.

The forum is; US MODERN CPOINS / US VARIETY and ERROR COINS, if you are interested.

Thanks again.

Regards,

Edited by stoystown_pa
05/24/2020 5:08 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,909Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums