This article from today's (Sunday) New York Times does not bode well for
ebay regarding counterfeit items. Although it centers around counterfeit jewelry, it might as well have been discussing coin auctions and certain dealers who are notorious for selling counterfeits. This might also explain
ebay's recent positive actions against fraudulent sales such as reported in the below thread, "Good
ebay News". The NYT article is long (two pages), so here's a few pertinent quotes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/29/t...=1&th&emc=th"Tiffany & Company... has sued
ebay for facilitating the trade of counterfeit Tiffany items on the site.
"If Tiffany wins its case, not only would other lawsuits follow, but
ebay's very business model would be threatened because it would be nearly impossible for the company to police a site that now has 180 million members and 60 million items for sale at any one time."
And:
"After the spectacular case in 2000 when a fake Richard Diebenkorn painting was nearly sold for $135,000 on
ebay, the company put in place a handful of safeguards, like the PayPal buyer protection plan, an improved system for spotting
ebay policy violations, and improved detection of fraud in general. But when it comes to counterfeit goods, the problem has gotten worse.
"Artwork is particularly vulnerable to counterfeiting. 'The majority of things that appear on
ebay are fakes,' said Joel Garzoli, an art gallery owner in San Rafael, Calif.
"Mr. Durzy [from
ebay] argued that 'if we began to automatically pull listings for things reported to us as fake, we could be pulling listings that are legitimate.' He added that the company had to rely on trademark owners to 'tell us something is counterfeit.' Yet trademark owners like Tiffany say they have gotten no relief."
For coins, there are no trademark owners, but the last sentence above says it all: despite a preponderance of evidence stated in a complaint to
ebay, it seldom pulls an auction even on an obvious counterfeit.