| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,178 |
|
Valued Member
United States
335 Posts |
Edited by BuyGuns
05/29/2020 05:20 am
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
That is one gorgeous 17-P Merc. I think your over stressing the reduction in grading , the only hits that could be an issue is the small ones on reverse on the upper middle sticks of Fasces . MS-66 FSB .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Solid 65FSB, could well make 66. Very nice!  Edited by Coinfrog
05/29/2020 09:11 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36782 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Agreed to all of the above. MS65-66 FSB, very nice looking coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
992 Posts |
MS66 FSB, 10% of 67 FSB. IMO.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Looks like a bit of chatter around the chin. Otherwise fantastic. I'll say MS-65+ FB.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5832 Posts |
Appeared original surface.
MS 65 FB.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
MS-65, FSB nice coin |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18673 Posts |
borderline MS65. looks like FB and possibly FSB. there are quite a few nicks on the column and the obverse strike is not that bold to pull a 66 imo
|
|
Valued Member
United States
110 Posts |
1917 Mercury dime is beautiful and nice overall luster, both sides have very few back marks, no wear. MS66 at best .Very nice. Bob  |
|
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
335 Posts |
MS-63 FB. Will post Slab when received. Disappointed in this one. I thought at least a MS-65 FB. Looks great in picture. Ya just never know. So onward.....  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Well clearly there is something we're not seeing in the pictures  I'm saying undergraded though. Had this been submitted by one of the big guys, might be seeing a different grade on that slab, just my opinion. |
|
Valued Member
United States
335 Posts |
Yes...PCGS. It's on the picture. And I agree. Undergraded, but that's why I am not a TPG. Lol. They are the experts. Oh well. A bit disappointed as I think the Clearview pictures speaks for itself. Looks 65'ish to me. At least. Oh well. You think this is undergraded? Go look at my 1925 Stone Mountain post (original Posted 12/01/2019), which I also posted the newly graded picture, plus some comparison pictures. Unreal. Where's the consistency? Grapecollects nailed it at AU55, but I am referring to the other AU55's being called comparible to mine. And the MS68's are nice, but not way far from my sample IMO. It may be an AU55, but when compared to many PCGS graded AU55's, it is not even close. ZERO Consistency. Sad part is, I have more to post, and wait until those that commented in the past hear what PCGS came up with for those. Lol. I see some serious quesions flying now. And this is my first go of it. But I said all the time.....this will be my learning curve. And I am about to be schooled. Haha. I have no problem with that. Edited by BuyGuns
07/01/2020 12:45 am
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,178 |
Posted 05/29/2020 09:10 am
