Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1973 Lincoln Cent --WDDO-001 Found In Pocket Change--Any More Comments?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,001Next Topic  
Valued Member
mb560600's Avatar
United States
361 Posts
 Posted 09/16/2020  09:04 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add mb560600 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Rich Cooper offered photographs of what a worn 1973 LMC WDDO-001 looks like---see his post below. In my humble opinion, this is how my coin appears in the photographs I provided. It has the same doubling, and I have provided the die die markers as provided by Wexler. Rich did not provide comment, and I am hoping he will...as will others.

If I have this correct, this is listed as Best of Variety by Wexler, a Class 5 CW spread which shows on IGWT and LIBER in LIBERTY. It's got a bit of wear, but it appears to be EDS. I found the applicable die markers as I note below.

1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?

1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
uploaded/mb560600/20200916_1973-Lincoln-Cent--WDDO-001--OBV--photo-9-ccfopt.jpg[/img

1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
A short vertical die scratch between R and I in AMERICA.
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
A curving die scratch near the rim at about 8:00.

Any opinions about the grade?
Edited by mb560600
09/17/2020 12:00 am
Pillar of the Community
levelsofmadnes's Avatar
United States
3003 Posts
 Posted 09/16/2020  09:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add levelsofmadnes to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
mb560600 to the CCF!

Your coin is not WDDO-001.

Pillar of the Community
SamCoin's Avatar
United States
3237 Posts
 Posted 09/16/2020  09:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SamCoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Doesn't look like it to me. Not seeing the extra thickness on any of the letters in IGWT, the splitting at the base of the L in LIBERTY, or the splitting at the top of the G in GOD. Die markers should only be used to distinguish a coin you know to be a doubled die or other variety from a similar one, not to prove that a coin without obvious doubling is a doubled die.
Valued Member
mb560600's Avatar
United States
361 Posts
 Posted 09/16/2020  12:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mb560600 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sam,
This is a rather worn coin, so some of the areas you question are difficult to photograph. However, respectfully, I disagree with your comments about the doubling which appears on this coin. My review of the photographs shows that the coin pretty well matches the doubling images which are displayed in the Wexler photos for the 001. You questioned whether the G in GOD had a split seriff---see the additional photo of this part of the motto below.
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?

You also questioned the appearance of doubling in the lower area of the L in LIBERTY. The L does have a lot of wear. But see the additional photo below which shows the vertical line through the lower L---which is where the doubling appears in the Wexler photo.
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?

I would be interested to see what others in the community have to say. If you need additional photos of the coin which you feel are necessary to confirm that this is WDDO-001, I will be happy to provide them. Thanks!
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 09/16/2020  12:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
1973-Lincoln-Cent---WDDO-001-Found-In-Pocket-Change--Any-More-Comments?
Valued Member
mb560600's Avatar
United States
361 Posts
 Posted 09/16/2020  12:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mb560600 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Rich--I see the same doubling on my coin as displayed in the images you posted. What is your opinion?
Bedrock of the Community
merclover's Avatar
United States
10635 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2020  12:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add merclover to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with Sam. It's all in the letters, in this case, the lack of the extra thickness in IGWT .

Your coin is not a WDDO-001.
Valued Member
mb560600's Avatar
United States
361 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2020  01:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mb560600 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OK,thanks merclover. You say there is no "extra thickness" in IGWT on this coin. But you apparently do not dispute that there is extra thickness on LIBERTY---as you did not mention that. Correct? Will you also agree that the photos appear to indicate that this coin has DDO on LIBERTY and IGWT, and that it has the die markers that appear to be the same as Wexler indicated appear on WDDO-001? I am just trying to understand how this coin can have so much similarity to the 001 but not be considered such. Could this be a new variety or sub-variety?
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,001Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums